Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does anywhere online have decent hats?


CRA

Recommended Posts

Sorry but the new hats are whack.  Anyone know where they might have older versions of some of our past caps (the stretch fitted stuff).  The new shiney plastic looking Panther just won't look good when I am pimping my cargo shorts and guaranteed to win a job interview Panther polo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, CRA said:

Sorry but the new hats are whack.  Anyone know where they might have older versions of some of our past caps (the stretch fitted stuff).  The new shiney plastic looking Panther just won't look good when I am pimping my cargo shorts and guaranteed to win and job interview Panther polo. 

Cargo shorts = real men.  No fugs given.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jeremy Igo said:

I just bought two hats online mainly because of my huge head. I can never find hats  in stores that fit but have had luck online. 

 

 

I also have a watermelon head.  The one size fits all is bologna.  

new era 39Thirty stretch fit (L/XL) seems to be my perfect hat.  That is generally what our sideline caps are each season.  Loved the all white with the little black pattern that was on the front bordering the logo.  Wish I could find that one from about 3 years ago 

big headed folk ain't got the selection in stores as 90% of the hats are for average size heads. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, PandaPancake said:

Why would you buy an online hat?

Better selection? I pretty much know which brand/styles work for me by now.  Why would I go to a mall to look at a small percentage of the overall hats available that one store might choose to carry. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...