Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Notes and Photos - Day 6 - Come and get it


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Hey, people saying Voth makes poo up, where ya at? I've been hearing echoes all day.

TC reports are great but unless we are there we don't know enough. Like in this article, Bradberry being the #1 is totally news to me. Very interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ShutDwn said:

Hey, people saying Voth makes poo up, where ya at? I've been hearing echoes all day.

TC reports are great but unless we are there we don't know enough. Like in this article, Bradberry being the #1 is totally news to me. Very interesting.

To be fair,  it isn't number 1 and number 2 as much as it us left and right. Bradberry starts on the left. Worley in the right. I was just meaning who the better cb could be in the long run. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

TE Scott Simonson has been getting plenty of reps with the first and second teams, maybe as many as Dickson. This could mean that Dickson and Simonson are in direct competition for that number 2 tight end spot, with the 3rd spot being already claimed by seventh round draft pick Beau Sandland.

Bye bye Dickson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awesome notes about the back of the roster position battles. I saw Norwood and Byrd mentioned, are they the two closest to that 5th WR spot currently? Also is it a fair to guess that Horton-Miley and Delaire-Cox would be the direct competitions at DE? All I have is pre draft measurements (height, weight, length, etc) to speculate off of but each pairing is very similar in that aspect. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

To be fair,  it isn't number 1 and number 2 as much as it us left and right. Bradberry starts on the left. Worley in the right. I was just meaning who the better cb could be in the long run. 

First of all, thanks for doing this. Secondly, can you tell a difference in the athleticism of the CB group now, compared to last year? I don't expect any of them to be more athletic than J-No, but I'm guessing that the overall athleticism has gone up, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TE Scott Simonson has been getting plenty of reps with the first and second teams, maybe as many as Dickson. This could mean that Dickson and Simonson are in direct competition for that number 2 tight end spot, with the 3rd spot being already claimed by seventh round draft pick Beau Sandland.

I could definitely see Dickson getting cut or possibly traded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, 15 said:

he tried to make it sound like the dude tore his ACL again when it wasn't anything serious at all. and then claimed that nobody thinks Hill is good anyways and has no chance (even though he is already an average bubble player anyways). This is the first I've heard of him having a bad day all around so idk where he's getting that or why he would make such a bold statement. 

then I remembered he's a below average media guy that needs clicks.

No he said he's not quite the same WR

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Hogmolliesmaht said:

First of all, thanks for doing this. Secondly, can you tell a difference in the athleticism of the CB group now, compared to last year? I don't expect any of them to be more athletic than J-No, but I'm guessing that the overall athleticism has gone up, no?

I think they are every bit as athletic as J No. Just maybe not as aggressive and competitive. I think the overall athleticism has gone up at the cost of experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...