Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Not a good look for Beau Sandland


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

If you plan on making the roster as a Panthers rookie tight end, you have to be able to run block and pass protect. 

Here, Sandland gets pushed back into Cam Newton by a blitzing linebacker. 

giphy.gif

If it was a DT or a DE, I would understand. But that is Avery Williams, 6'1 246lbs. Sandland has 10 pounds on him

How much would you like to wager he hears about this play tomorrow. . 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep blocking for sure is NOT his strong suite. Im still not ready to write him off, given I believe the panthers may carry 4 TEs. He  would be a "red-shirt" this year, plus both Olsen and dickerson have preseason injuries, Denver game is less than 3 weeks away.

One red flag I had on him, was he leftd completion in Miami. He just needs time, he's got some tools working for him. I'm sure Dave has already put out the feelers about where the rest of league feel about him, if hot he's on the 53.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OnlyPantherFaninMaine said:

Looks like Remmers had no clue who to block there.

I just noticed Tolbert on the far right rusher. I guess Remmers was supposed to help Trai with #90, but hesitated and started to go for Sandland's guy.  Not an excuse for Beau but maybe not all his fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Thunderbird037 said:

Who was Remmers supposed to block? Looks like Sandland was 1 against 2.

I noticed this right off the bat.  Feels a like a little much worrying about a rookie TE sliding over to pick up the extra rusher while our starting right tackle completely whiffed on both guys in front of him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why don't we just say they can shove the late round draft picks up their ass? If they want a player they will be starting at WR in Week 1, I want a MLB in return that we can start Week 1. Starter for a Starter Not Starter for a draft pick we'll be debating whether or not they should make the final 53 man roster in 2026.
    • Why?   No. This isn't a situation of a player we want to trade because we have no use for them.  He's our starting slot WR, our leader of the young WR room, Bryce's safety option the last 2 years who he has good chemistry with. If the Vikings didn't run into WR trouble, we'd never have been even considering trading him, so why in the world should we give him up for fair market value in a vacuum for Thielen and disregard what losing him off our roster will do for us this year? A 5th round pick in 2026 is a negligible draft pick, especially with this season being so make or break for Bryce and Canales.
    • The Vikings acquiring all these late round picks has me feeling like we're about to see another CMC situation play out here. Trade a player we really like for the equivalent of what we want for them on the draft pick chart, but because of a bunch of late round picks instead of the one pick value we actually want. Which will do the same thing in the end, nothing, because 6th and 7th round picks rarely work out to begin with, or we're just going to use them to move up 10 picks in the 3rd or 4th round to take another DJ Johnson
×
×
  • Create New...