Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina's Greg Olsen primed to have best season of all TEs in 2016


ladypanther

Recommended Posts

http://www.espn.com/nfl/insider/story/_/id/17365712/nfl-why-carolina-panthers-greg-olsen-best-season-tight-end-2016-better-season-rob-gronkowski-new-england-patriots

 

 

Quote

 

Carolina Panthers tight end Greg Olsen comes in at No. 45 on ESPN's ranking of the 100 greatest players in the NFL. That's a pretty big jump for a player who ranked No. 74 in the 2015 version of ESPN's top 100.

As impressive as that leap is, Olsen might be in line for an even bigger jump in the 2016 season, one that could put him in contention with Rob Gronkowski for the honor of best tight end in the NFL.

 

Quote

With this many factors in his favor, it will be a surprise if Olsen does not post the best season of his career in 2016. It should be the type of campaign that pushes Olsen into the top 20 of ESPN's Top 100 NFL players list in 2017 and could vault him to the top of the tight end category.

Love that Greg is getting some love out there. He is an awesome Panther.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ill be pretty shocked if this happens. Only because our passing game looks to be poised for a massive breakout from other receivers. Greg was our #1 last year, this year is much, much different. But who knows? I know Greg will always be a big part of our passing attack because he's a beast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i mean i love greg and everything but he's not gronk, who is probably the best ever. only way he finishes with better numbers than gronk is if jimmy g is that bad in those four games. even so, gronk is still a top tier blocker and olsen is just admirable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't put it past #88 to have a Gronk-tastic year (1200+ yards, 10+ TDs), but I agree with the other prior posters about our passing game.  With the return of Benjamin and Funchess coming along really well, there are only so many balls to be passed around each game.

What a terrible problem for Cam and us to have.... =)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree that the opportunity won't be there. Last season our opponent's number 1 priority (other than stopping cam) was probably stopping Greg. This year there's no way teams are going to be able to consistently double down on him with a linebacker and safety. If they do, they will be getting gashed all day long. I can see Greg averaging around 70-80 yards a game and approaching 10 TDs with ease. 

The only thing that's going to inhibit him is Ron/Shula insisting on playing a slow paced, ball control game every week even though we have the ability to drop 40 bombs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

all those who think olsen's numbers are going to drop significantly because of the return of kb, potential breakout of other receivers, etc., need to re think their position. Olsen is a fugging beast, arguably still the best receiving player on our team, and because of the two reasons stated above teams won't focus their game plan on him as much, because they got KB, funch, and even Ginn to worry about. Olsen gon' get his own. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You don't have to go through every game and point it out as we are discussing his GWDs. You specifically called out that he had GWDs because he is the reason the team is always playing from behind. We looked at those eight games and only Miami stands out as one where he put the team in a hole to begin with. You've added the Atlanta game where the team didn't score a TD but only kicked field goals. You're not trying to change what we're discussing to fit your feelings re: Bryce. That's not necessary. We are discussing GWDs per the thread topic. We have also shown that your opinion that the team has had to always come back due to Bryce was proven to be false as was the claim that "minus one game" was his fault. Appealing to emotion afterwards by trying to broadly paint the rest of the losses in the same way just doesn't work. Where in the Hell did you get that the entire point is the suggestion that BY is more clutch than Jake and/or Cam? It's giving something to be positive about in that Bryce has shown the ability to comeback and win games despite the calamity that might have taken place to put them behind to begin with. How is that blasphemy?
    • His run blocking is making up for his negatives in pass blocking right now.  He’ll still have pass blocking hiccups, but if they think he’s a critical part to the locker room and team construction, you probably re-sign him and try not to overpay.
    • Callahan is gone McDaniel and Taylor are happening Stefanski is a growing possibility. I mean, they need to get an offense going eventually.  Could see Morris as a surprise one.
×
×
  • Create New...