Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bump this thread every time tre boston is terrible


electro's horse

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

Is it bad if I think that Coleman has looked worse?

Norman factor, honestly, he allowed Coleman to head-hunt for interceptions, which he's great at.  Now that he has to cover more and help out our rookie CB's, he's a little exposed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CPF4LIFE said:

I would be lying if i said i didnt miss Harper a lil bit, you just didnt see these coverage blunders when he was on the field like this.

People were pointing out coverage blunders or being to slow on a minute by minute basis last year.  And fwiw, every year since I have been posting on this board.  Which is why I have learned to look at the final result, and not individual plays, or even individual games.

 

Fwiw, I thought Boston played fairly well today.  He had some good coverage moments, and a few bad ones.  Played better against the run this week.   The secondary as a whole gave up one long td, but most of SF's points came after Panther turnovers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

People were pointing out coverage blunders or being to slow on a minute by minute basis last year.  And fwiw, every year since I have been posting on this board.  Which is why I have learned to look at the final result, and not individual plays, or even individual games.

 

Fwiw, I thought Boston played fairly well today.  

I wasn't really blaming Boston in my post I was referring to Harper being a vet and knowing where everyone was supposed to be and aware of responsibilities.  Harper was slow but he was always in the right spot and cleaned up really well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, SOJA said:

I love Tre but if he doesn't improve it's going to be an area of concern heading into next season 

The guy is a 4th round pick who has only started a couple of games in his career. Did you expect him to be a pro bowler right off the bat? Let's give him at least half a season as a starter before we call him a concern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Hogmolliesmaht said:

The guy is a 4th round pick who has only started a couple of games in his career. Did you expect him to be a pro bowler right off the bat? Let's give him at least half a season as a starter before we call him a concern.

calm down I said I liked him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I said could, not would. I recognize he has potential based on past performance. Compared to what KP has done, Howell has more potential and the physical traits to make noise. KP has small hands and a weak arm. Not something you want in even your backup QB.  I've been hammering since last off-season before we re-signed Dalton, improve the room. Other than getting younger, I don't see how anyone can say we legitimately improved the room or even tried. We might as well have signed Josh Rosen.  Dalton is still on the roster for now. That's 3 QBs unless we trade or cut him. He's still Bryce's mentor after all. Do you believe we are going to draft someone with potential and give them a legitimate opportunity to develop from the practice squad? Are we going to carry 3 QBs on the active roster? 4 for a developmental rookie? Are we going to potentially cut KP if we draft a rookie and he's outperformed? Doubtful. Cutting Dalton(if we can't trade him) and KP would be 8m in wasted cap space.  I chose Howell as an example because he showed promise in his only full season as a starter. You could plug in another name with the physical traits and potential and what i said would still apply. KP showed almost nothing and was benched. I genuinely don't care if it’s rookie pick as long as there is the potential to develop into a future NFL QB.  As much as I can't stand him, Bellichek was always developing a number 2 QB even with the GOAT as his starter. The wisdom of that was evident when Cassell came in when Brady was hurt week 1 and went 11-5 and almost made the wildcard, which 11-5 gets you almost any other year. I give credit where it's due though. Cassel and Jimmy G both came into the league as developmental QBs, potential QB1s, and went on to have careers.  You never know if you never try. KP feels like a punt in addressing the most important position on the field. Bryce has never played 2 full games of franchise QB level football back to back.  If Bryce progresses, are you ready to offer a 280m 5 year extension based off a one hit wonder year? If Bryce regresses and we need a QB in 27, are we going to trade a fortune away again to trade up to 1 to get one? Are you ready to do the past 3 years all over again?  To me, it's not about Kenny Pickett. It's about the move itself. It was a feeble attempt to improve the QB room. We better hope Bryce succeeds, because if he doesn't, we literally have no backup plan right now.   
    • IOL that early isn’t good value at all. We have a LT who might not ever be good again and a RT that might retire soon. T seems deep early in this draft, so I’d go there in the 1st. 
    • Season tickets aren't affordable anymore definitely when they've been so bad for 8 years before last season. When I started going my seats were front row uppers for like 38 bucks. Those seats are 100 dollars now. Teams make their money from tv, if I was an owner my goal would be to break even on tickets and concessions. 
×
×
  • Create New...