Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

RIchard Sherman on player safety (Cam mentioned)


tiger7_88

Recommended Posts

While I agree with everything he said, the problem continues to be that people are talking about Cam getting hit and focus on whether or not he had a concussion, and the focus should be on the pieces of poo that kept spearing him. 

So Sherman can (rightfully) bitch that the NFL didn't do enough to protect Cam, but can't sidestep the fact that had those players been suspended like they should have, the NFL players union would have fought tooth and nail to overturn it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the most part, this is applicable to all business.

You think the big banks of Charlotte care about their employees? Bottom line = All that matters. Yet look at the career pages of most of these companies with words like "family" and "culture" thrown around.

Once you see a company (find a loophole to) terminate a tenured employee diagnosed with cancer, essentially giving them a death sentence, this becomes painfully obvious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aren't the dirty players a big part of the problem as well?  I mean everybody is making money in the game so it comes down to how the players want to player the game.  

The game can still be competitive without a few cheap shots to the head because you can't beat the guy otherwise.    No one involved with the game has clean hands on this issue.  Not the owners who profit from a gladiator sport, not the players who's drive to be rich and famous playing a kids game and will risk seious injury or death to do so.  The fans want their thrills and most are too ignorant or uninterested in the squabbles between millionaires and billionaires.

Until the players decide what kind of game they want to play and police their own dirty players and the league decides to enforce meaningful punishment on obvious and repeat offends like they do in cases of drug and peds, they all are just wasting oxygen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
    • The Giants, Cardinals  and Dolphins should have moved on, but they didn't and ended up cutting their QB early into a monster second contract and had to eat a TON of dead cap money.
×
×
  • Create New...