Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I've had enough of this bullcrap!!!!!!!!!!


Matthias

Recommended Posts

We have the most dangerous phenom in the entire NFL, and we are afraid to use him?  No, I'm not talking about Cam Newton.  Obviously we are not afraid of using his abilities.  I'm talking about our number one receiver in Kelvin Benjamin, a guy who is literally uncoverable even if he is covered.  Not only is he tall, the guy is packed with muscle!  There is no way on God's green earth any one man can cover him.  It is a grand insult that people say Xavier Rhodes shut him down.  NO!!!!!!!!!!!!  Again we are talking about a guy who is taller than Randy Moss and Calvin Johnson, and stronger than Adrian Peterson, yet he have received only a handful of targets these past two games?  One target in the Vikings game?

Aaaarrrghhhhhhhh, it makes me rage just thinking about it.  Just throw it to him.  Send him deep.  He will flick off any scrawny corner trying to jump with him.  The physics alone says he will beat triple coverage 9/10.  So let's stop all this bullcrap about our offense stalling.  It's stalling because we're making the choice to stall it.  Anytime KB gets less than 20 targets a game, we only hurt ourselves.  What do yall think about the grievous ineptitude in our offensive strategy we got going here?  Just throw it to KB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Matthias said:

We have the most dangerous phenom in the entire NFL, and we are afraid to use him?  No, I'm not talking about Cam Newton.  Obviously we are not afraid of using his abilities.  I'm talking about our number one receiver in Kelvin Benjamin, a guy who is literally uncoverable even if he is covered.  Not only is he tall, the guy is packed with muscle!  There is no way on God's green earth any one man can cover him.  It is a grand insult that people say Xavier Rhodes shut him down.  NO!!!!!!!!!!!!  Again we are talking about a guy who is taller than Randy Moss and Calvin Johnson, and stronger than Adrian Peterson, yet he have received only a handful of targets these past two games?  One target in the Vikings game?

Aaaarrrghhhhhhhh, it makes me rage just thinking about it.  Just throw it to him.  Send him deep.  He will flick off any scrawny corner trying to jump with him.  The physics alone says he will beat triple coverage 9/10.  So let's stop all this bullcrap about our offense stalling.  It's stalling because we're making the choice to stall it.  Anytime KB gets less than 20 targets a game, we only hurt ourselves.  What do yall think about the grievous ineptitude in our offensive strategy we got going here?  Just throw it to KB.

 

giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I heard one analyst say that Parsons is (or was relative to the same age) a better player than Mack. Could be recency bias, but I'd say that that's absolutely true.
    • Watson is a cautionary tale because he pulled that trade coming off a full year he didn’t play due to injury and then almost a whole other full season due to an 11 game suspension for being a creep.  If Parsons was coming off all of that, I’d agree - we don’t do it.  But Parsons has been mentioned with the likes of LT and Mack.  If we could swing it, we should do it.  I don’t think the cowboys would trade him in-conference, but we’ve seen wilder things happen before (McRib to WSH).
    • Saw a post somewhere earlier that said what the Bears gave up for Khalil Mack would be a fair comp as to what to expect it would take to get Parsons.  But Parsons is actually a year younger than Mack was at that point, and also, I believe Mack was named an all-pro at two different positions that prior year, iirc…  but I think Parsons is as equally versatile. we should definitely see what it would cost, at minimum.
×
×
  • Create New...