Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A legitimate reason as to why we will make a run


SwagAces9030

Recommended Posts

By run I do not mean 10-0... I could see 9-1, or 8-2 and i'll explain. Everyone is overly frustrated with the struggling secondary, but the answer is on our roster. Bradberry came out week 1, and took a beating by Thomas. That said it was his first start ever against a very talented WR, but Bradberry still looked the part. He came out week 2 and played great, the only TD he 'gave up' was the deep ball where Tre was late coming over the top. (He was the number 1 rated CB for week 2) If we have him against Atlanta (we still lose) but Julio does not go off for 300 yards. The big play to Mike Evans the next game I don't feel happens with him on the field, and I also feel the bomb to Cooks this week doesn't happen. I feel with Bradberry healthy and on the field after the bye week he will shore up a lot of the issues you see going on. He will not be perfect, but with our offense finally finding its groove (Mainly due to Stewart being back) I feel it will be enough to limit the big plays and finally start racking off some W's. I know we lost but it was nice to see the offense finally click. This team is used to going on runs, we have done it 3 years in a row now I see no reason as to why we can't find ourselves 5-5 or 6-5 at some point this season.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KillaCamNewton said:

dude...the fun's over. this year was a waste. our best hope is to get in the top 5 and pick a game changer like the Cowboys got with Zeke and be able to go right back to being a contender

I agree that we do need a game changer at the RB position, Stewart can only last so long. To me Fozzy and CAP are NOT the answers to the backfield once Stew hangs it up or wears out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't look at the worst secondary along with one of the worst pass rushes in football and think they are going to all of sudden flip the switch.  The entire defense is on skates.  The offense, with Cam playing well, might be good enough to win some games against the teams with both a bad D and bad O, but looking at the remaining schedule they are few and far between.  If they go 5-5 down the stretch that would be really solid for this team, but not in terms of draft position though.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, SwagAces9030 said:

By run I do not mean 10-0... I could see 9-1, or 8-2 and i'll explain. Everyone is overly frustrated with the struggling secondary, but the answer is on our roster. Bradberry came out week 1, and took a beating by Thomas. That said it was his first start ever against a very talented WR, but Bradberry still looked the part. He came out week 2 and played great, the only TD he 'gave up' was the deep ball where Tre was late coming over the top. (He was the number 1 rated CB for week 2) If we have him against Atlanta (we still lose) but Julio does not go off for 300 yards. The big play to Mike Evans the next game I don't feel happens with him on the field, and I also feel the bomb to Cooks this week doesn't happen. I feel with Bradberry healthy and on the field after the bye week he will shore up a lot of the issues you see going on. He will not be perfect, but with our offense finally finding its groove (Mainly due to Stewart being back) I feel it will be enough to limit the big plays and finally start racking off some W's. I know we lost but it was nice to see the offense finally click. This team is used to going on runs, we have done it 3 years in a row now I see no reason as to why we can't find ourselves 5-5 or 6-5 at some point this season.  

I agree man, Bradberry can help cover half of the field and if you have Teddy on the other side his speed will help him recover if he bites on double move. Also the offense is on a roll and if we play similar to Dallas style O the secondary will not be exposed as much! KEEP POUNDING!!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i like bradberry he has talent and potential we need him back but this is a learning year for him as well . the difference between whorley , sanchez and bradberry is bradberry has the potential , whorley and sanchez will be out of the nfl in a couple years they straight suck. we need to make another move if we are going to attempt to save this season but we probably will sign a bum at most and thats not even guaranteed . i like what i have seen from teddy he has a similar mentality as norman just doesn't have the skill set but he does look like a decent corner for the most part.  mcclain has to go he is so bad as well . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, juliosantos said:

i like bradberry he has talent and potential we need him back but this is a learning year for him as well . the difference between whorley , sanchez and bradberry is bradberry has the potential , whorley and sanchez will be out of the nfl in a couple years they straight suck. we need to make another move if we are going to attempt to save this season but we probably will sign a bum at most and thats not even guaranteed . i like what i have seen from teddy he has a similar mentality as norman just doesn't have the skill set but he does look like a decent corner for the most part.  mcclain has to go he is so bad as well . 

Williams has the speed and size just needs more experience, far as McClain goes he is best suited to play nickel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To start with, you wouldn’t want to count up that value chart. You would see quickly where that is headed. But you basically did a quantity comparison, while ignoring quality.  I am looking at 2023 as the start, because it became all about Bryce.  2023 you have 4 picks plus DJ Moore for offense vs 2 (80 and 145) for defense.  2024 you got the 1st overall, the 32, the 46 and the 101 for offense vs 72, 157, 200 and 240 for defense. Leave the FA IOL out of it. Which was a crazy big  investment. But it wasn’t draft.  Anyway, that is basically 4 top 100 picks for offense and 4 picks for defense in 2024. Except they were 2 first rounders, the second rounder, and the 4th was really high at 101. Vs 72 and day three stuff. Please….  Second quoted/bolded… See you think we hate Bryce. That isn’t it at all. It is nice easy way to characterize us and discredit our talking points though.   Me, I do mostly hate watching him play. But I don’t hate the person. I hate the hell out of the stanning.  It started with the very first question I asked about his footwork, arm strength, and size. Height being the principle objection. I never even got to the durability factor. There was plenty without factoring that in.  But there was rabid opposition to even asking the question of what a couple of small fractions of a second extra closing time would do for the defenders.  What the extra time it takes to flip the hips would do vs a pass rush or on the other end after the ball is in the air. Split second more for recognition where it is going for the DBs.  The tippy toe backpedal.  That poo was a mess and it has always been mess but no Bryce fan wanted to hear it. “Go get another team to root for”. “It worked in the SEC it will be fine in the NFL you don’t know football you are just a hater”.  It got worse when the real games started. It has never stopped. It is nice that many people have left that train so there is less abuse but it hasn’t stopped.  So whatever… 
    • Whatever school you attended, I don't know and I don't care, but I would suggest demanding a refund.    Something was completely missed there.
    • The draft capital since since 2023 has in no way been pretty even.  Especially when you zero in on day 1 and day 2 draft picks.  Draft capital has vastly gone toward the O over D.  
×
×
  • Create New...