Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Last night was James Bradberry's coming out party


electro's horse

Recommended Posts

On 11/18/2016 at 7:37 AM, SOJA said:

FG return was overblown- he's a rookie who got caught up in the moment and tried to do a little too much- guarantee he'll never do it again

He had a touchdown saving play

BUT AGAIN LET'S DISCUSS HOW GETTLEDOUCHE IS A fuging IDIOT AND HAS NEVER DONE ANY POSITIVE THINGS FOR OUR FRANCHISE 

He is an idiot...would love to have Norman on other side...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Kakarot said:

I can see Bradberry being a Gamble clone. That would be awesome, as Gamble is one of my favorite players. Wore #20 in HS because I was a CB, and was a huge Gamble fan. 

I was living near Columbus when Gamble was lighting it up at Ohio State.  Ditto Ted Ginn.

Was thrilled when both became Panthers,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, stbugs said:


I agree, but Norman could have signed like many others have. As stated by Igo, he wasn't going to play under the tag. It's not like he wasn't tagged and he couldn't have played with us if he signed it.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Meh, he would lose a ton of money sitting out being tagged.  He would've signed it in my opinion.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

He is an idiot...would love to have Norman on other side...

Norman wouldn't sign the franchise tender.

I repeat:

NORMAN WOULDN'T SIGN THE FRANCHISE TENDER.

(And, no, the "Golly gee I was gonna sign it!" PR put forth by Norman and his team AFTER everything ended doesn't count.  Because if he was "gonna sign it" then he damn well would have signed it.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, nctarheel0619 said:

Meh, he would lose a ton of money sitting out being tagged.  He would've signed it in my opinion.  

How in the living hell would he have signed it when it was available to be signed by him for weeks and yet HE DIDN'T SIGN IT?

Is there some alternate reality y'all are living in where Norman was chasing that franchise tender contract all across the country, eager to sign, but he just couldn't catch up to it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎11‎/‎18‎/‎2016 at 8:25 AM, Dunn said:

285 yards last night vs. 465 in Week 6 for Brees...its not just him, but BOTH CB's played very well last night.  

 

Kinda amazing that our Defense started playing well once Bradberry and Worley started playing better. Sure they make some mistakes, but I have never seen a CB that was perfect. Well, very few anywho. Cuz there have been some real good ones through the years.

 

They don't have to be perfect. Just keep playing smart and growing. Hellz, there are a bunch of teams in worse shape than we are right now. As a Lions fan, I would take both of them right not. Throw in Johnson, and the Panthers are no where near the bottom of the league.

 

Speaking of Johnson. Any updates?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tiger7_88 said:

Norman wouldn't sign the franchise tender.

I repeat:

NORMAN WOULDN'T SIGN THE FRANCHISE TENDER.

(And, no, the "Golly gee I was gonna sign it!" PR put forth by Norman and his team AFTER everything ended doesn't count.  Because if he was "gonna sign it" then he damn well would have signed it.)

Bad strategy by G-man...still left us in a bad place...looking for rinse and repeat... perpetual rebuilding for other teams... G-man the perfect developmental  league GM for the NFL..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

Bad strategy by G-man...still left us in a bad place...looking for rinse and repeat... perpetual rebuilding for other teams... G-man the perfect developmental  league GM for the NFL..

 

The math says not to sign players over 30. Norman is not old in terms of NFL milage... but a bulk of his contract will be of a 30+ year old version of himself . 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...