Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some troublesome stats


Verge

Recommended Posts

Our points scored in the first half of games this season: 

132

Opponents points scored in the first half of games this season:
85 (This stat gets even better when you take out the 24 point blowup against NO)

Now, this looks great right? It seems like we should be winning the majority of the games, then comes the second half stats.

 

Our points scored in the second half of games this season:

100

Opponents points scored in the second half of games this season:
161

This is pretty bad, and it seems to be a common trend even going back to our 15-1 and 7-8-1 season. Why are our second halves so terrible? Rivera, Shula, just the players? 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know I sound like a broken record, but this coaching staff just doesn't believe in 2nd half adjustments. They work all week on a gameplan and run it no matter what come Sunday. That's why I feel this coaching staff will never win us a superbowl. Yes, we almost did last year, but we saw just how inept they were when they were too damn stubborn to change up the gameplan in the biggest game of the year. To consistently be a winning team year in and year out, you have got to have a coaching staff willing to make adjustments on the fly and tweak the gameplan if it isn't working.

Not only that, but Rivera's bitchass strategy of sitting on leads has pissed me off ever since he got here. We thought he turned the corner when his ass was about to get canned, but he has reverted back to his old ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now if the Defense continues to improve, our first half scoring could still win us some games.

 

Wow, even as optimistic as I am, and that still scares me. Not the numbers themselves, cuz they kinda stink. But the Offense as a whole. This whole year has been a mess Offensively. Never saw the Offense playing this badly this year, not for nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes I think the sitting on a lead accusations are a little overboard.  If you look at the 4th qtr of the NO game, I think they were trying to be aggressive.  But the receivers kept dropping the ball, or we got sacked.   Up until KB's big catch, we had four straight incompletions on pass attempts, and I think at least 3 of the 4 were drops.  Its hard to be aggressive when your receivers keep dropping the ball, and your offensive line is down to its third center.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, motocross_cat said:

Im not sure what is worse.  Watching them tie cams hands behind his back or watching the corners play 15 yards off the wideouts.

Its painfull.  This sunday with no luke we must go for it all the entire game.

 

I think handcuffing Cam should be a mortal sin. I know when this Offense is clicking, Cam can look like a magician. But when we are struggling, Cam looks mortal.

 

We are not the only team that gives a cushion with their CBs. It is designed to let the CBs drive on the WR to make a play, and to keep the play in front of you. The longer you make an Offense drive, the more the chances of a mistake go up. It is a solid strategy, but it is boring for fans.

 

1 hour ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Sometimes I think the sitting on a lead accusations are a little overboard.  If you look at the 4th qtr of the NO game, I think they were trying to be aggressive.  But the receivers kept dropping the ball, or we got sacked.   Up until KB's big catch, we had four straight incompletions on pass attempts, and I think at least 3 of the 4 were drops.  Its hard to be aggressive when your receivers keep dropping the ball, and your offensive line is down to its third center.  

 

And at least against NO the Defense stayed aggressive as well. They got pressure with 4 DL, they used the zone blitz effectively, and they did CB, and S blitzes as well. Even late in the game we were running stunts, and rushing 5. So they did try to stay aggressive on both sides of the ball.

 

Man those drops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly think it's a culmination of reasons.  I'll start a list of what comes off my head:

Mental.  I honestly think some of it is getting mental.  You could tell in the fourth quarter thursday the team had no chance of doing anything on offense or defense.  Just their persona.  They knew it was going to happen.

Too conservative.  I think we all know this can be an issue with this coaching staff.  Especially on defense.  When we get big leads we just give teams huge cushions.  I'll admit I'm not great with X's and O's when it comes to talking football, but it's clear we tone down the pressure and have our secondary players back off with big leads.  They go away from what works.  This allows teams to just effortlessly rip off 12-15 yard plays.

Lack of execution on offense.  From Shula down.  We're all quick to blame Shula and I do it too, but our offensive players simply don't execute when playing with a lead.  I actually thought Shula remained pretty aggressive in the second half Thursday, he let Cam try some passes on early downs even with a big lead.  He also called a phenomenal tight end screen to Greg Olsen that went for a big first down on a third down conversion.  But we had some just terrible dropped passes Thursday, a lot that killed drives.  Dickson, Brown, Benjamin, Funchess I know all had awful drops that would have been nice gains.  

Our depth sucks.  I think this is some of it.  We got gassed up front especially on the DL Thursday and the Saints feasted, we lack depth everywhere right now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...