Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our offense lacks a big play threat sorely, it's a huge weakness


FuFuLamePoo

Recommended Posts

Watching the Redskins last night, their offense had a knack for creating big plays. With guys like Crowder, Jackson and Garçon they have a slew of guys that can stretch the field vertically. We don't have anyone that can get behind the defense on a regular basis. Cam has a cannon, but he doesn't even get to use it much because no one is a true threat vertically. I think Ginn was supposed to be that guy, but he's clearly lost a step and has shaky hands anyways. He did have that 38 yard TD Sunday, but I honestly bet that's been one of our 2 or 3 longest TD's this year. Redskins had TDs of 44 and 70 yards last night.

Agree?

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't disagree per se but I have also noticed we don't call as many deep threat plays this year, or at least that is my perception watching the games. In my opinion one has to do with the other, ie, we aren't calling those plays due to a lack of weapons OR we aren't giving guys like Ginn and Philly (and possibly Funchess) enough chances to make those plays because they aren't being called with any frequency. It isn't clear to me which is the bigger factor.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, FuFuLamePoo said:

 

Watching the Redskins last night, their offense had a knack for creating big plays.

 

There's a hint of that, but it was greatly exaggerated by going against the depeleted Green Bay secondary. They've been really, really, really, really bad and extremely short handed due to injuries.  

NFL Team Opponent Average Team Passer RatingCapture.JPG

Source

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't lack a deep threat, we lack an offensive line (mainly due to injury) to provide time for strikes, we lack a running game that forces an 8th man into the box regularly to give our receivers one on one opportunities. A lot of our issues stem from the trenches, it all starts there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With regard to Washington's big plays last night being used as a reference, it sure doesn't hurt that GB's defensive backfield is arguably worse than Carolina's. At one point they flashed a graphic of QB ratings against each individual corner, and the lowest was 122 - 2 of them were in the 140s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bad part of line play and play calling is if you know your line is suspect, then why call plays that take a long time to develop?

Hurry up offense or get the ball out of Cams hands faster or screens etc.

But all of this is dead horse beatings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, SetfreexX said:

We don't lack a deep threat, we lack an offensive line (mainly due to injury) to provide time for strikes, we lack a running game that forces an 8th man into the box regularly to give our receivers one on one opportunities. A lot of our issues stem from the trenches, it all starts there.

I agree with this. The time it takes for defenders to go 5 yards to get to Cam is far less than the time it takes our receivers to run 40+. With time, we have players who can make big plays. See: Funch & Ginn last two games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think it's unfair to call Funch or KB a true "deep" threat. We don't have a speed guy that can get behind defenses, we just don't. But that doesn't mean they can't be big play guys, especially KB. Sometimes I wish we'd just throw the ball up to him, especially when we are lacking momentum. Just give him a chance to make a play


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, FuFuLamePoo said:

I still think it's unfair to call Funch or KB a true "deep" threat. We don't have a speed guy that can get behind defenses, we just don't. But that doesn't mean they can't be big play guys, especially KB. Sometimes I wish we'd just throw the ball up to him, especially when we are lacking momentum. Just give him a chance to make a play


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

We do have a speed guy that can get behind defenses.  Used him a lot last year. Named Ginn Jr.  Still fast, still makes defenses respect him.  However our line is far worse than last year over all.  Couple that with this year we are focused on the big possession receiver. Good receiver but can be taken out of play on any route that's not a slant.   When ever we heavily feature Greg Olsen(who is always a mismatch problem), good things happen all around. Keeping Olsen in to block on anything that't not a run play is a god damn travesty. That is one of the few things I put solely on Shula. All that other stuff is a combination of bad line play, and Cam mistakes in my opinion.    Love me some KB, but Greg Olsen should be the focal point of our offense like Gronkowski is in New England. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...