Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Bucs GameDay Thread....


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

" You play the game to win ". Herm is right, why should we dress up 53 players to lose ? Please explain that to me. Unbelievable to go to a game and fans wants us to lose because of a future draft pick that in best case will have an impact 2-3 years from now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, TheRed said:

I don't give a flying poo about draft position if it means getting swept by the Bucs of all teams.

We adopted this mindset in 2010. Yeah it got us Cam. But we've been trying to rid ourselves of it for years.

I think, unless a clear upgrade at QB or a truly generational talent would be made available with a loss or two more, it is never in any team's interest to blow off a game. Losing breeds losing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • The price to trade for him, would likely completely bankrupt our future draft assets. I would have been all for a Hendrickson or Parsons trade in maybe 2017 or 2018. But this team is so far from being good and needs SO much help to build, those draft picks are almost priceless.  Let's not forget the insane cost it took to get Bryce and how much that harmed our drafting ability.
    • People like to say that, but I don't know if it's true. We went a few years trying to answer the QB question on the cheap amid bad coaching. We did what other teams do and tried to address QB by giving up a king's ransom and moving up. I mean, I guess that could be considered a "splash move," but I see it more as trying to draft the next big thing at QB.  I think that he's been more impatient than anything else. He gave too much power to Rhule who didn't know what the hell he was doing and relied on Fitterer who left a lot to be desired as well. Sure, we may have tried to get Watson and Stafford, but that's all a part of trying to answer the question at QB. "Splash moves?" maybe, but I think it's just business as usual for teams without a QB. Parsons would be a "splash move," but he's about as sure a thing that you could acquire for the capital. 
    • Yeah, not sure about that unless we really have a dominant offense, especially running game. If not.....then what was it worth?
×
×
  • Create New...