Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who would you least want to win the Super Bowl?

Cyberjag

By Cyberjag,
in Carolina Panthers

Who would you least want to win the Super Bowl?  

110 members have voted

  1. 1. Who would you least want to win the Super Bowl? You can choose more than one.

    • New England Patriots
      35
    • Dallas Cowboys
      40
    • Pittsburgh Steelers
      15
    • Atlanta Falcons
      77
    • Green Bay Packers
      6
    • Kansas City Chiefs
      3
    • Seattle Seahawks
      33
    • New York Giants
      4
    • Detroit Lions
      1
    • Houston Texans
      1
    • Miami Dolphins
      1
    • Oakland Raiders
      2

Recommended Posts

X-Clown Mentor

X-Clown

Posted
Posted

I posted this in another thread, but this is how I view it:

I'm not excited because there are sure are a lot of hateable teams/fanbases that are in this year. I put the hate I have into two tiers.

Tier One:

Cowboys

Patriots 

Falcons

Tier Two:

Seahawks

Redskins 

So basically root for whoever is playing those teams, begrudgingly root for a tier two team vs. a tier one. Root for the universe to melt before picking sides on tier one teams playing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
shaqattaq Grand Master

shaqattaq

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, Nails said:

If you answer other than Falcons or Seahawks I don't understand how you're a true Panthers fan.

And what a depressing thread among many depressing threads!!!

2017 is still going to be a great year for this franchise.

Disagree. The Pats cheated us out of a SB. They will forever be at the top of my list of teams every Panther fan should hate.

obviously ATL is evil and should never prosper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted

The Falcons are #1 by a long shot. Followed by Dallas, New England, Seattle, and Pittsburgh. I'd enjoy seeing the Lions win the Superbowl. That team has had so much bad luck they deserve a championship or at least to get there. Rooting for our cat bros in Detroit. If Kansas City won I wouldn't complain, Reid deserves a Superbowl title. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By CRA · Posted

      A rookie that has never played a snap and a proven 1000K NFL WR are not going to be viewed the same in these type rankings.  And calling draft picks, lotto picks, isn't some new quip I just invented.  take the big 3 Hubbard, AT, insert whatever 3rd Panther you want vs Kamara, Hill, Olave.  Most football folks outside of Carolina are picking the Saints there IMO.    
    • WUnderhill
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      You didn’t really address the point, just like you ignored the point about the RBs initially, and saying “they are all lotto picks” is just a really silly reduction because you could say that about literally any player rookie or vet every snap, every game, every year. It is well known that different positions have different hit rates, and I would argue different types of prospects within position groups as well, and that hit rates change the further down in the draft you go. Everybody knows QB is different and that, for example, first round OL have a really high success rate. Using your lotto ticket analogy…again…you are saying a lotto ticket with a 1 in 100 chance of hitting is the exact same thing as a lotto ticket with a 1 in 2 chance of hitting (this is an example, don’t take these odds literally). The point was he is no more of a lotto ticket than the 31yr old receiver coming off a major knee injury, and in my opinion he is better odds with a higher potential “jackpot”. Saying one player is an “lotto ticket” while another isn’t is just not sound logic. You have no idea who will break out, regress, get injured, etc. There are safer bets than others, that’s all. I don’t think Diggs is a safe bet and even if he was, weighing him over all of the Panthers WRs plus 2 1k rushers is just dumb. You can disagree if you want. The list is stupid.
    • kungfoodude
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      Yeah, this is all projections of how it will turn out. Inevitability this list will look ridiculous in a full 2025 sesson hindsight, most likely. Still, I am pretty surprised that so many bristled at being thought of as having very, very lowly ranked WR and TE units. We literally have been for years. All you have to do is just have things stay the same and those are immediately bottom 5 units. It is easy to see why one would be reticent to have lofty expectations in the preseason. Gotta show it first when you are a perennial cellar dweller. That's just life at the bottom.
×
×
  • Create New...