Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

JPP looking to get paid.


KDawg004

Recommended Posts

According to Ralph Vacchiano:

 

"I'm not playing (again) on no one-year deal," he told reporters the day after the Giants' season ended. "I've proved it. I've showed it."

So yeah, he'll be expensive. According to a source familiar with his situation, he has his eyes set on at least the five-year, $85 million deal (with $52.5 million guaranteed) the Giants gave Olivier Vernon. Given the number of teams with cap space to spend who are likely to be looking for a pass rusher -- including the Cowboys -- he might end up with more.

https://www.sny.tv/giants/news/re-signing-pierre-paul-hankins-a-top-priority-for-giants/214204640

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two double digit sack seasons out of seven and now he's playing with a mangled hand. He had seven sacks this season.  Five and a half of them came in the last two games of the season... against the Browns and Bears who hold the first and third overall picks, respectively. Sacks vs. playoff bound teams? Zero. Pass. HARD pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It wouldn't shock me if he got it. Vernon got that contract after back to back 6.5 and 7.5 sack seasons with only one double digit sack season to his name. Them again, Vernon was also three years younger than JPP at the time and had two fully functional hands. I could definitely see JPP getting say 4/$60M from somebody. JPP is just demanding that contract because he's mad that the Giants gave a FA DE that money instead of him. All he had to do was not blow off his hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Black&Blue said:

I'll bump this thread when I'm right, so you can kiss my ass.

be my guest, I'm not the slightest bit worried about this coming true. I wont be kissing your ass if you are right though. you'll maybe get me saying you were right but thats about it.

but with that said, will you at least come back here and say you were wrong? I wont ask you to kiss my ass, thats just juvenile.. you just have to declare in a topic linking to this post that your name is "john snow" and "you know nothing".  I'll even give you a $20m cussion, so if he signs within $20 million of his $85m asking number you can claim victory. so do we have a deal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...