Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you trade for Rob Gronkowski?


Montsta

Recommended Posts

I am sure Gronkowski is great.  But Brady gets suspended, the Patriots win 3 out of 4.  Welker leaves for Denver and struggles, the Pats keep rolling.  Gronkowski goes out for the season, Patriots don't miss a beat.  Makes you wonder if Gronk would be yet another patriots player who fell off the map after leaving New England.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely without question would trade for Gronk if we had the chance to.  Gronk is one of the best blocking TE's in the league and him and Olsen on opposite sides of the formation is just scary.

Also doesn't hurt that I was a student at Arizona when Gronk was playing there and is my favorite non-Panther in the league because of that, so..............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Montsta said:

Bill is known for getting rid of players a year early rather than a year late. The Patriots are 7-0 without him, and if they win the SB without him would Bill get rid of him for a high second?

He has an injury history but a Olsen-Gronkowski duo reminds me of Hernandez and Gronkowski except we'd have a Walter Payton MOY candidate instead of a quadruple murderer sociopath. 

Would you guys be down for that and at what price?

Yes, I would send Funchess along with him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...