Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Desean Jackson or Pierre Garçon?


Nate Dogg

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, SwagAces9030 said:

What do you mean "meh"? Jackson is an immediate upgrade over ginn.

Don't disagree with that. There are always free agents that are immediate upgrades over current/former players.

I mean I'd rather use whatever Garcon or Jackson would cost and upgrade at like 5 other positions, or toward KK, or toward Star, or toward Trai.

If they are cheap or the same price as Teddy, then sure. I am assuming they can be had at a premium, a difference I'd rather use elsewhere.  If Ted wants to play hard ball, kick him to the curb and get Stills, play Byrd, or draft someone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, imminent rogaine said:

Don't disagree with that. There are always free agents that are immediate upgrades over current/former players.

I mean I'd rather use whatever Garcon or Jackson would cost and upgrade at like 5 other positions, or toward KK, or toward Star, or toward Trai.

If they are cheap or the same price as Teddy, then sure. I am assuming they can be had at a premium, a difference I'd rather use elsewhere.  If Ted wants to play hard ball, kick him to the curb and get Stills, play Byrd, or draft someone.

I don't know that Jackson will get the money everyone is thinking he will. I mean he's been misused now in Washington for what 3 years now? Obviously he will cost more than Ginn. I just don't think he will fetch as much as everyone thinks. Which could end up being a bargain for us because I feel he would put up Philly like numbers in our system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thefuzz said:

Jackson is going to break the bank somewhere.....looking at you San Fran.

He could, but don't you think the chances are small? He already got his yuge contract and he's older now. I'm not saying it will be team friendly, but surely it won't be that yuge right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

He could, but don't you think the chances are small? He already got his yuge contract and he's older now. I'm not saying it will be team friendly, but surely it won't be that yuge right? 

No, I fully expect him to get a pretty big deal.  If that isn't the case, I'm all for having him in the building.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly He's played two seasons and started 28 games. He's well beyond the point of being able to point to 2 or 3 games and being able to say, "THAT is the QB he is and will be in the future" Of course he can get there, but anyone trying to use just those couple of games to rank his place amongst the games QB's today and their full career's worth of playing at that level, is just asinine. Mahomes, Allen, Lamar, Burrow, Hurts, Herbert, Daniels, Stafford, Goff, Geno, Purdy, Baker, Love, Dak, Tua, Kyler, Lawrence That's 17 QB's right there that have played better over their careers than Bryce has played at his best.  And I'm not saying they're all studs or guys I'd want to be our QB moving forward, Tua for example I wouldn't touch with a 10 foot pole, but his body of work is a million times better than Bryce's has been. It's also not including any of the other QB's drafted in 2023/2024 other than Daniels. So again, say you believe in Bryce, say you think he's going to prove he can and should be our QB of the future, that's all fair and totally fine. But nobody can say he's been an above average QB in his career thus far, it's just an asinine notion.
    • I'd think we could get one of those from Dallas for... whatever. 
×
×
  • Create New...