Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFT/Denver Post-Broncos unlikely to pick up Okung option


Nails

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, RoaringRiot said:

But doesn't this also mean the demand is going up?

That would be interesting if several of these "named" OTs just swapped teams.  I wonder how much actual change is happening?

That being said, while everyone gets excited for FA season, there's a reason these guys are either allowed to walk or getting out while they can.  Let's all try to remember that before we get into heated FA debates. =)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, RoaringRiot said:

But doesn't this also mean the demand is going up?

I think like the poster above said, the question of "why" said player is available only helps the buyers.

Even if our target is Thomas, Staley, or Peters, the price drops since those are losing teams and/or teams that need picks after the trade to get Wentz (Eagles).  I still want Staley-quality on and off the field for three years until age 35, the last two years at a reasonable $7.7.  The 49ers are desperate for younger assets and have openly dangled him.  They can't demand as much with news like this.

The more options are available the better for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nails said:

 

The more options are available the better for us.

Completely agree with this. 

But I think understanding the plans for these teams that are releasing their Ts is a good move and of course like you guys said why is that player not in their plans any longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, d-dave said:

That would be interesting if several of these "named" OTs just swapped teams.  I wonder how much actual change is happening?

That being said, while everyone gets excited for FA season, there's a reason these guys are either allowed to walk or getting out while they can.  Let's all try to remember that before we get into heated FA debates. =)

A lot of this can be attributed to a combination of age and injury problems mixed with a contract that the team doesn't think is worth the risk/hassle. The same argument can be seen by some on here about Stewart. He has a high salary for a runningback, injury problems and is getting old. It's not that Stewart isn't a good runningback, he just doesn't seem worth the money to some people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, imminent rogaine said:

Maybe but its also possible that teams replace from within. I don't know specifically what the backup situation is on any of these teams but maybe "the answer is already on the roster".

Miami, for example, Is replacing from within with Tunsil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say the fact that Dave Canales insisted on a 6 year contract should tell anyone all they need to know about his potential job security under the Tepper's. No matter how much we have heard recently about how David Tepper has learned from this and that. This is still the same man who spent $43.5 million to buy and then immediately demolish a house because of who owned it previously.
    • Same lineup to hopefully finish this one out tonight.  Here's today's projected lineup from the Hurricane's official website:   Tonight's Projected Lineup... Forwards Svechnikov - Aho - Jarvis Hall - Stankoven - Blake Ehlers - Staal - Martinook Carrier - Jankowski - Robinson Defense Slavin - Chatfield Miller - Walker Gostisbehere - Nikishin Starting Goaltender Andersen --- Injuries N/A Scratches Nicolas Deslauriers Pyotr Kochetkov Jesperi Kotkaniemi Mike Reilly --- PP1: Aho, Ehlers (Staal), Jarvis, and Svechnikov with Gostisbehere PP2: Blake, Hall, Jankowski, and Stankoven with Miller I'm getting to the point to where I have to get away from social media.  The narrative is still in some circles that Carolina has played no one.  I just don't see how you can continue to discount what our opponents in the playoffs have done, either to make it to the playoffs or the clubs they beat to faceoff against us.  I know this is how Carolina always get's treated, but if we win tonight our record is 12-1 in the playoffs. 12-1!  Meanwhile, along the way the "talking heads" had us losing in every round.  Maybe, just maybe, Carolina's just that damn good. /rant Here's to kickin azz and taking names tonight. LET'S GO CANES!!
    • Still a conflict of interest with TB owning a portion of the Raiders
×
×
  • Create New...