Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

One thing is clear, the brass is giving Shula the benefit of the doubt.


Recommended Posts

We've all agreed in certain things in the past. 

 

This offense needs a better line. This offense needs weapons. To some extent it has been addressed.  This year more than ever. The brass probably thought, "Well we're getting KB back, we don't need to improve the offense more". Hindsight right? I do recall Shula saying something about getting another tight end. 

 

Even in the 15-1 season most of us had our doubts about the offense. The key was probably the missing piece. KB was gone so Cam had to look elsewhere.  Defenses probably didn't think Ginn or brown or Funchess were a threat of any kind. Rightfully so, what defense will fear that trio?  Well that year was more about Cam Newton being the motor that kept that offense running. Probably his best statistical year. He audibled more than ever that year. Probably not liking what Shula called in. 

Last year was a disaster. Mainly injuries, on the line. Cam had his #1 back and was honestly forcing too much. Again with really bad play calling. 

 

Record being good enough for a top ten pick.

The silver lining being that when the Panthers have had a bad season the next season always is good. This type of pattern isn't good for obvious reasons. But the fact remains. This year is going to be a good year. 

When the Panthers transitioned from Hurney to Gettleman. It was unusual, to see a new GM keep the old GM's coach. Usually when that type of change happens the new GM brings in his own guy. Not Gettleman.  He gave Ron an opportunity.  He answered with a 12-4 season. Gettleman knows continuity is a good thing. But also knows that improvement is better. He identified areas that needed upgrade and players that quite frankly,  weren't needed. For the most part he's replaced or upgraded the roster. Keeping the core in place, the core that gives this team an identity. Having to pause 7 seconds to find out that Cam Newton is indeed a franchise QB. From there, he's been catering to Cam's play style. Drafting guys with big catch radius' so he would have an easier time connecting. I'm sure he knows Cam's accuracy isn't the best. He is working around it. In comes Shula and most of us were not pleased. I know Jeremy wasn't. I sure wasn't. He knew the system. 

 

To me this system went vanilla once Shula took over. When Chudzinski was at the helm this offense was a TE friendly one. Chudzinski was too smart for his own good at times and probably put too many creases into plays but there was no denying the offense moved along just fine. Maybe it was the personnel they had back then. Olsen, Shockey,  a respectable deep threat in Smith, a possession receiver like LaFell?  A power back like Stewart and a change of pace back like Williams?  Then you had a star rookie as well. Not afraid to make plays.  If I remember correctly Cam had a safety valve in his TEs if he didn't have something deep. His passes and the plays didn't take so much time to develop.

Fast forward and now you have long developing plays with one good tight end and about three possession receivers. Ginn being the deep threat. That needs to be upgraded.  Shula might be lobbying for a second TE and a true speed guy to make this offense more potent than years past. 

 

I expect this draft to address the offense more. Thus the brass giving Shula the benefit of the doubt. If they do acknowledge Shula's plea and get another TE,  then another player that can be utilized either in the backfield or as a slot or outside guy, then we will find out if Shula is the problem or not. 

 

A scenario here would be the Panthers getting someone like Howard in the first and then a WR in the second or trading back up in the first for one. Which is a huge possibility.  Then come this season we will know. 

 

Either way Ron went all in with Shula. I remember distinctly Gettleman saying he wanted some change but Ron stepped in and said he trusts Shula and the staff. The result will be on the field this coming season. If they fail to make the playoffs and have a sub 500 record, I wouldn't doubt one second they'll be looking for work. 

Continuity is asinine without Continuous improvement.  That needs to be emphasized. 

Here's hoping for the best. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

We've all agreed in certain things in the past. 

 

This offense needs a better line. This offense needs weapons. To some extent it has been addressed.  This year more than ever. The brass probably thought, "Well we're getting KB back, we don't need to improve the offense more". Hindsight right? I do recall Shula saying something about getting another tight end. 

 

Even in the 15-1 season most of us had our doubts about the offense. The key was probably the missing piece. KB was gone so Cam had to look elsewhere.  Defenses probably didn't think Ginn or brown or Funchess were a threat of any kind. Rightfully so, what defense will fear that trio?  Well that year was more about Cam Newton being the motor that kept that offense running. Probably his best statistical year. He audibled more than ever that year. Probably not liking what Shula called in. 

Last year was a disaster. Mainly injuries, on the line. Cam had his #1 back and was honestly forcing too much. Again with really bad play calling. 

 

Record being good enough for a top ten pick.

The silver lining being that when the Panthers have had a bad season the next season always is good. This type of pattern isn't good for obvious reasons. But the fact remains. This year is going to be a good year. 

When the Panthers transitioned from Hurney to Gettleman. It was unusual, to see a new GM keep the old GM's coach. Usually when that type of change happens the new GM brings in his own guy, but not under Jerry Richardson who gave Ron an opportunity.  He answered with a 12-4 season. Gettleman knows continuity is a good thing. But also knows that improvement is better. He identified areas that needed upgrade and players that quite frankly,  weren't needed. For the most part he's replaced or upgraded the roster. Keeping the core in place, the core that gives this team an identity. Having to pause 7 seconds to find out that Cam Newton is indeed a franchise QB. From there, he's been catering to Cam's play style. Drafting guys with big catch radius' so he would have an easier time connecting. I'm sure he knows Cam's accuracy isn't the best. He is working around it. In comes Shula and most of us were not pleased. I know Jeremy wasn't. I sure wasn't. He knew the system. 

 

To me this system went vanilla once Shula took over. When Chudzinski was at the helm this offense was a TE friendly one. Chudzinski was too smart for his own good at times and probably put too many creases into plays but there was no denying the offense moved along just fine. Maybe it was the personnel they had back then. Olsen, Shockey,  a respectable deep threat in Smith, a possession receiver like LaFell?  A power back like Stewart and a change of pace back like Williams?  Then you had a star rookie as well. Not afraid to make plays.  If I remember correctly Cam had a safety valve in his TEs if he didn't have something deep. His passes and the plays didn't take so much time to develop.

Fast forward and now you have long developing plays with one good tight end and about three possession receivers. Ginn being the deep threat. That needs to be upgraded.  Shula might be lobbying for a second TE and a true speed guy to make this offense more potent than years past. 

 

I expect this draft to address the offense more. Thus the brass giving Shula the benefit of the doubt. If they do acknowledge Shula's plea and get another TE,  then another player that can be utilized either in the backfield or as a slot or outside guy, then we will find out if Shula is the problem or not. 

 

A scenario here would be the Panthers getting someone like Howard in the first and then a WR in the second or trading back up in the first for one. Which is a huge possibility.  Then come this season we will know. 

 

Either way Ron went all in with Shula. I remember distinctly Gettleman saying he wanted some change but Ron stepped in and said he trusts Shula and the staff. The result will be on the field this coming season. If they fail to make the playoffs and have a sub 500 record, I wouldn't doubt one second they'll be looking for work. 

Continuity is asinine without Continuous improvement.  That needs to be emphasized. 

Here's hoping for the best. 

Corrected

That is why we are drafting OJ Howard if Fournette is gone.

Coaches are going to have more input in this year's draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newton needs to get over his yips as well

i have been on the oj Howard bandwagon as a Two TE offense Newton did quite well using his first year...granted Shula was not the OC

my point is, Howard is special.

Go get him as he fixes a multitude of issues more so than any other pick...including he knows how to block   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been dying for more 2 TE sets since Shockey left, but we've never had a second TE of that caliber here since he left.  Even if Fournette is available, i think i'd still go with Howard.  Dude knows and appreciates the value of blocking, first and foremost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

Either way Ron went all in with Shula. I remember distinctly Gettleman saying he wanted some change but Ron stepped in and said he trusts Shula and the staff. The result will be on the field this coming season. If they fail to make the playoffs and have a sub 500 record, I wouldn't doubt one second they'll be looking for work. 

Voth reported a while back that Gettleman urged Rivera to make some changes to his offensive staff, specifically regarding Shula and Ken Dorsey.

He likely figured Ron would fight for Shula but sacrifice Dorsey hence his stated expectation that Dorsey would be replaced.

Instead, Ron reportedly"stuck his neck out" for both.

If they fail this season, Rivera could very well be the one who pays the price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sanjay_rajput said:

Coaches are going to have more input in this year's draft.

As has been reported many times, the coaching staff has always had full input on the draft.

Gettleman prefers a collaborative approach where everyone has input. He then makes the final decision after listening to what they all have to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure, there's definitely a chance that a fire sale in 2022 could've paid off but I don't think that's a certainty. It's not just about stockpiling the picks and bettering odds; it's about hitting on those picks, having a stable coaching staff to develop them, and keeping the locker room engaged. We didn't exactly have a model front office nor stable coaching staff in 2022. It's worth noting that part of the reason that DJ had to be included in the trade up for #1 was because the Bears needed an immediate, proven WR1 to help Fields. It was him or another immediate first-round pick, not a future one like what was being offered for Burns (whom teams knew that things were shaky with and that they could afford to wait). As for the Eagles, they recovered because the foundation was already in place. Pederson got flak and was ultimately fired (and was just fired again this offseason from the Jags). Their recovery was quick because the foundation was already in place: Howie Roseman and a solid roster (that included a stacked OL, a second year QB, and a veteran defense). Philly had a margin of error that just wasn't available to Carolina. I'm not against using the draft to rebuild, but a full-on teardown comes with real consequences: fan disengagement, a fractured locker room, poor development, a losing environment... and I don't believe that we had the necessary leadership at the time to cleanly navigate it. That's a gamble that I want no part of.  Now that we do have a staff that seems to be in complete alignment and building for the future rather than fighting for their jobs, I'm more inclined to observe their process and see where it leads rather than backseat driving with "perfect" hindsight. 
    • I see it a bit differently considering there is only 20M in cap space. Given how many of the premium positions are on rookie contracts their cap should not be nearly maxed out. Tillis still has a lot of work to do before these rookies will need a second contract. 
×
×
  • Create New...