Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fournette or OJ Howard?


CAPantherFan

Recommended Posts

As an LSU fan, I've seen nearly all of Fournette's games and he is the real deal. He was the best running back on the team. It does not take a genius to run the read option running attack and most of the work is on the Qb. I wouldn't mind either but Fournette should be taken if he's available. 

 

 

My pipedream is for us to trade next year's 1st and both 2's for us to get a Fournette and Howard combo. I think it would be worth it.

I like that idea although that was when OJ would slip down some and cost us this years picks and not next yrs 1. I will go with Fornette as I cannot freaking imagine seeing that beast in a Panthers uniform. I do really like OJ doe.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OJ Howard - he would completely revamp our offense. He is a mismatch in the passing game, an excellent blocker and a future replacement for Greg Olsen.

If you recall, a few years ago we almost took TE Tyler Eifert in the 1st round. We've been looking for a TE for years now, this is out chance to get a potentially great one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, panthers55 said:

Howard. Really wish we brought him in for a look given we rarely pick up guys we don't bring in....

Gettleman has already seen/mentioned Howard.

If Howard already checks off their boxes, why bring him in? Of course, they may still bring him in.

"O.J. Howard, Tanoh Kpassagnon impress Dave Gettleman at Senior Bowl"

http://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2017/01/27/o-j-howard-tanoh-kpassagnon-impressing-dave-gettleman-at-senior-bowl/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, bull123 said:

I've been on the Howard train from the beginning but after hearing about CJ having back surgery I think we need to take the best DE available

Got to have intense pass rush to compete in our division
 

Good point about our division making defense / pass rush a priority. And yes, CJ's surgery got a bit lost in the news of Cam's upcoming surgery, but the news that CJ is having back issues definitely makes DE a high priority in the draft, in my opinion. (I already thought DE was a high priority need, CJ's surgery just adds an exclamation point to that need.)

I'd be ok picking Thomas or maybe Allen at #8 and then going OFFENSE heavy with RB, TE, WR being the next three picks (not necessarily in that order.)

I too am on the Howard bandwagon.  I think he has a chance to really help us change up our offense.  I also like McCaffrey (like his versatility and the idea of having a return threat.).  A bit torn on Fournette...

Either Thomas or Howard and #8 and I'd be very happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, LordOfDaWingz said:

My pipedream is for us to trade next year's 1st and both 2's for us to get a Fournette and Howard combo. I think it would be worth it.

Fournette & Howard?!  That would be pretty amazing... but hard to imagine G'man ever trading away a 1st.  That said, he's surprised us this year with such an aggressive FA.  If he really is in WIN NOW mode and willing to go all-in, then anything is on the table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Jeremy Igo said:

I am no draft expert, and I could be wrong, but I am not sure the league will allow us to pick two players at 8. However, I think it is worth a try!

I would laugh for 44 years if it turned out that there was no rule against it, just nobody had ever tried it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • THE WALKER BACKGROUND Here is where this gets weird.  Walker is a serviceable LT who could benefit from Gilbert's experience and coaching.  However, he is known for below-average run blocking and frequent penalties.  As you know, a penalty from a LT is a drive killer. A former 7th round pick, Walker has outperformed expectations, but he still ranks around the middle of the pack when compared to other tackles.  Having said that, it seems as if the Panthers are banking on Walker for a year and will then make a decision on Ickey.  In Green Bay, Walker was the starter, but the Packers weren't exactly sold on him. While most people think the oft-injured David Bakhtiari retired in 2023, he really wanted to keep playing.  He was released on March, 11, 2024.  Walker stepped in and took the reserve LT job from Nijman in that 2023 season, but they were close--probably because Nijman was more of a swing OT.  However, Nijman was a free agent in 2024, so the Panthers signed him just a week after Bakhtiari was released, leaving the Packers only Walker to play LT.  A month later, the Packers drafted a LT in the first round, Jordan Morgan out of Arizona.  Most Packer fans believe that Morgan would have beat out Walker for the LT job in 2024, but he had some shoulder injuries and went to IR after 6 games. In 2025, when the Packers had an injury at G during the season, instead of putting Morgan in at LT for Walker as planned, they played Morgan to guard because Walker can only play 1 position.  The Packers currently project Morgan back to LT for 2026, which is probably why they did not seek to retain Walker, at least in part. Based on this history, it is safe to say this: Walker is better than Nijman. We have the benefit of them being on the same team in a direct competition to help us see that. Walker is probably closer to Ickey, except for the penalties.  That bothers me a lot.  Bryce sucks when we get behind the sticks, and a run-first offense with a poor run-blocking LT is not ideal.   Regardless, I think Ickey and the Panthers find themselves in limbo right now, so the Walker deal comes at a perfect time for the GM.  Gilbert, perhaps, can work on the penalties and maybe a TE like Tremble can help offset the run blocking issues, so maybe we can actually stay the course at OT.  Maybe we do not draft a LT--maybe we draft a RT to groom behind Moton.  Maybe we draft a C.  At LT, the Panthers do not want to overreact, especially if Ickey returns to form or Walker demonstrates improvement.  Depth is certainly a concern, but a solid RT can be that depth.   I doubt the Panthers draft a LT in rounds one or maybe two.  It seems we have bigger needs at Will LB, DT, TE, and maybe S.  
    • THIS! IF we go offense at 19, it should be the trenches, which is no longer a pressing need with Waler's signing. 3 biggest needs in 2026, IMO, are DT, FS, ILB. We need to upgrade our starters at those positions and I expect anyone rafted at 19 to start immediately. I could rationalize OT (right or left) or CB since we're an injury away from a severe drop off AND have huge offseason concerns at both next year. Unless Bryce plays a lot better, I want to upgrade QB next year so I could get behind locking in a 2027 starter this year if the right guy is there. You COULD argue NCB and TE are positions where we need to upgrade our starters, sure, but not at 19. Both positions can still be upgraded on day 2.
    • He's firmly a second rounder and I don't think we would go that high for a TE this draft.  Third?  Possibly. I mean Rhule drafted Tremble in the third round who clearly was just a blocking TE.  
×
×
  • Create New...