Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: Panthers 100% Sold On Fournette - Will Be Pick If Available


Saca312

Recommended Posts

This is why I love the draft. It's great to hear people's thought in players. It's a mystery, the truth is no one really knows who is going to do well and who is going to do bad. I love hearing professional pundits on sports networks rave about a dude and then they suck. Aaron Curry is a great example of this. Everyone loved that dude and he was a dud. No one thought  Ton Brady would be worth a damn and he is the GOAT. See what I mean? It's tough to call any player a generational player. That's what makes this fun, it's a gamble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i saw fournette his whole career. when hes on (pounded Auburn one year), hed unstoppable. however, he is erratic. from one game to the next you cant be sure what your are getting. not sure if this purely an injury thing or what. hes got top talent, but its inconsistent.

plus, LSU has great OL, but bama shut his ass down several times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Panthero said:

i saw fournette his whole career. when hes on (pounded Auburn one year), hed unstoppable. however, he is erratic. from one game to the next you cant be sure what your are getting. not sure if this purely an injury thing or what. hes got top talent, but its inconsistent.

plus, LSU has great OL, but bama shut his ass down several times.

And the worst QB play of any power 5 school over Fournettes career. 67% of his carries were into 8-man boxes. The average is 31%. He also had 22%  into 9-man boxes. When you're one dimensional against very good defenses, teams rarely have success. And that OL was far from great. Average-above average is much more accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, stbugs said:

Times change and things evolve. Have you noticed that this year's draft class is the best in many years in the secondary? While the rules may be changing, have you noticed how defenses and players have changed as well? A guy like Fournette could be the thing we need to take advantage of the fact that this year and last year, CBs are being drafted once every 6 players and this year safeties are going to be drafted a ton as well.

I think it was Linville and I who were thinking the same thing, that if you really want to get ahead of the current NFL, you do something no one else is building their teams to stop. I'd love to see us get into a real power running game, not a great running game because your QB gets as many yards as your lead back, but a running game that forces the D to not have extra DBs on the field causing play actions to be unstoppable.

Maybe I am wrong, but it seems like NFL defenses are trending towards not being able to stop a great running game.

I find this argument interesting and compelling. A naysayer might say let's keep Shula until he's a strength not a weakness. But it just might be crazy enough to work.

92AED8D8-0D6A-47FA-BED2-62A41ABB77CD-2972-0000049B11933D9E.thumb.jpeg.b8fe515cab09c4a32a9f3333b2d6027a.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Toomers said:

And the worst QB play of any power 5 school over Fournettes career. 67% of his carries were into 8-man boxes. The average is 31%. He also had 22%  into 9-man boxes. When you're one dimensional against very good defenses, teams rarely have success. And that OL was far from great. Average-above average is much more accurate.

True, but most SEC teams didn't have good QB play this year. those stats don't explain inconsistency just overall lowered production. 

I'll give you that bama game though, a team that good that can make you one dimensional isn't a good example. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Toomers said:

And the worst QB play of any power 5 school over Fournettes career. 67% of his carries were into 8-man boxes. The average is 31%. He also had 22%  into 9-man boxes. When you're one dimensional against very good defenses, teams rarely have success. And that OL was far from great. Average-above average is much more accurate.

As an Auburn fan, you should recognize poor QB play the past 2 years.

Hasn't stopped us from having good RBs with good production.  And none of ours is a Leonard Fournette.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, The Lobo said:

...the truth is no one really knows who is going to do well and who is going to do bad. ...That's what makes this fun, it's a gamble.

And that's why I am generally against trading down. 

In a deep draft, the more picks you have, within reason, the better the odds of getting some really good players. Now if it's a very top heavy draft, it may make sense, but that certainly isn't the case this year.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Marguide said:

And that's why I am generally against trading down. 

In a deep draft, the more picks you have, within reason, the better the odds of getting some really good players. Now if it's a very top heavy draft, it may make sense, but that certainly isn't the case this year.

 

I used to hate trading in general. But I agree this draft is deep and it would be awesome to trade down. That being said, if the team believes in a guy at 8 then let's do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

I used to hate trading in general. But I agree this draft is deep and it would be awesome to trade down. That being said, if the team believes in a guy at 8 then let's do it.

Thanks for reading between the lines and not what I wrote.

I should have said, I am against trading up, i.e. trading two 2nds for a late first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...