Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Meeting With Miami TE David Njoku For Second Time


bobsfoodbasics

Recommended Posts

I could see us taking him at 8 if Fournette, Adams and Howard are gone. But as others have said, he is most likely a round 2 guy unless we feel we need to move up in the first to take him. I could definitely get behind a Fournette and Njoku in the first 2 rounds. I would think all the Shula detractors would love this. Give Shula what he says he needs and it will be put up or shut up time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

I can't imagine we would take him at 8 and if we do I'll strongly consider jumping off a building...

I know man, I agree.  And I'd be right there with ya, but there has been quite a bit of ridiculous talk here recently.  Such as moving up to #2 overall, which I would probably be just as upset over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, dpm0409 said:

I know man, I agree.  And I'd be right there with ya, but there has been quite a bit of ridiculous talk here recently.  Such as moving up to #2 overall, which I would probably be just as upset over.

I'm with ya. Such a deep class. I hope we don't give up any picks to move up unless it's an incredible value

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...