Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

That cutback though...


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

My prediction is still that DG wants both LF and CMc. If LF falls, watch for Carolina to draft him at 8, and then move up using multiple picks and maybe a future pick to get McCaffrey too.

Imagine, thunder and lightning both in the same draft...immediately you have your RBs of the future, and the offense is evolved at the same time.

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chardee MacDennis said:

My prediction is still that DG wants both LF and CMc. If LF falls, watch for Carolina to draft him at 8, and then move up using multiple picks and maybe a future pick to get McCaffrey too.

Imagine, thunder and lightning both in the same draft...immediately you have your RBs of the future, and the offense is evolved at the same time.

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app
 

won't happen. just extended J-Stew for another 2 years.  Can only carry so many running backs.

Now with that being said and in whatever world this scenario played out.  LF, J-Stew, and McC. watch out.

haha, overall I LOL'd at this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Hogmolliesmaht said:

If we end up drafting him, I would rather see him used mostly as a WR. He could be a great RAC guy if Cam can improve his ball placement a little bit on the shorter throws.

That's one thing I don't love about the idea of getting McC. He'll excel in shorter routes, or in a west coast offense. Not so much in a Coryell offense with Cam as QB who isn't even top half of the league in short throws. Give Cam a fast guy outside like Teddy or bigger targets like KB and Olsen and they'd fit much better with Cam than a player like McC. Clearly a talent as a runner too though, just not enough of one for it to justify picking him that early.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think that depends more on how high our pick is. If we have the 1st, 2nd or even 3rd pick i think we are drafting a QB rather than shopping FA market for a QB1. Curious if we’d be reluctant to start a rookie QB week 1 though. 
    • Hurney 2.0 and Fitts were so bad I don't know if it was intentional or they were that abysmally clueless. Fittershits panicked repeatedly being on the back end of positional runs while Hurney couldn't evaluate anyone outside of the 1st.  I can't figure out why Plummer still has a jersey. There's no reason. Dalton brings nothing to the table. If another QB gets cut that has given a glimmer of anything better than what we have, we should look, and that goes for every position.  I cant get over how much different this team could have been with a competent GM and having accepted the Rams offer for Burns. This franchise could have gone in a totally different direction. 
    • I thought tanking wasn't actually a thing and we were firmly against it though?
×
×
  • Create New...