Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which Analyst Was The Most Accurate


RumHam

Recommended Posts

This is why mock drafts are stupid (and why the serious analysts like Mayock only do them to appease viewers) because it's almost impossible to guess what each GM is going to do and to pick out all the trades. 

How a rational human being should judge these analysts is were they right about the studs and the duds three years from now. This is why I am indifferent about Christian. I didn't waste my time watching hours of tape, but I trust that DG did. If he's Christian ends up being the player we want him to be, then that's success. If mayock and others saw him having success in the next level then that's success. If analysts don't think Trubisky will have success and he does, then that's failure on part of the analysts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's why I want to know, because they are a waste and people take them too seriously. Kiper sat there in disgust last night not talking because he wasn't remotely close. He put a Linebacker with shoulder issues at #5. Anyone can be "opinionated" but it would help if someone was credible. I almost think the teams do this on purpose now despite the media. When they all talked about Chicago taking Solomon Thomas at #2, every casual knew it was for a QB. People just couldn't believe it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, RumHam said:

Kiper missed on like 75% of his picks. He seriously doesn't deserve a job. Anyways, who or where seemed to be the most accurate in the first round?

If he hit on 25% that would make him the most accurate. I think I read mayock only hit on 2 players. Garrett and McCaffrey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, RumHam said:

Kiper missed on like 75% of his picks. He seriously doesn't deserve a job. Anyways, who or where seemed to be the most accurate in the first round?

First time watching the draft eh? he misses on like 75% every year, he knows a lot about every player and thats why he is who he is, not for getting the picks right cause he never does

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

For those saying Mayock, Mayock is actually one of the worse mock draft analyst out there. Kiper is actually more accurate 

Actually untrue. Until this year, when everyone struggled, Mayock was top 5 in Mock Draft accuracy. Jason Boris, the 2nd most accurate mock drafter, until this year, only got 3 right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mocks are fun, but expecting them to actually be accurate is an exercise in futility. Just far too many variables with hundreds of prospects, different opinions within the same room (scout opinions vary a lot compared to media groupthink), trades, positional value assessments, etc. Getting the exact slot for 32 players correct is akin to getting 100% on your March Madness bracket.

But to answer your question: the top media guy from the first round was Marino from NDT, who got only 9 picks "right." That's 72% wrong, so there's only a 3% gap (or one correct pick) between the top guy and "how does this guy have a job?"

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In your opinion. What do you think Moton's true value in contract, dollars and guarantees? If we had not extended him, what is your plan for RT in 27 and 28? How important are good offensive linemen for our current offense? How much value do you put on protecting Bryce at this stage of his career? How difficult in general do you think finding above average tackles in the NFL is?
    • The Falcons have 2 significant offensive line injuries to start the 2025 season. Right tackle Kaleb Mcgary (who is the blindside protector for Penix since he is left-handed) is going to miss significant time, and it's looking more like it may be all season. https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/falcons-expect-kaleb-mcgary-to-miss-significant-time https://x.com/BKsquared7/status/1959285822236107013. Also, the top backup and swing tackle, Storm Norton (cool name BTW) is having ankle surgery and may miss half the season. https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/falcons-ot-storm-norton-out-6-8-weeks-after-ankle-surgery I don't root for injuries, but its also hard to be too sympathetic given how badly injuries have hit us in recent years. We definitely need to get that W in week 3 for our home opener at BOA. Despite our collective frustration at not being able to attend TC and then having boring preseason games, ultimately the most important objective of the preseason is to enter Week1 healthy, and we have at least done that. Hopefully the depth we think we have at Oline either shines through or isn't needed. Many other teams are in a bad spot with their offensive lines before the season even starts. For once, we aren't in that situation.
    • That roster was billed as a super smart and strong unit for a young QB….until he sucked though.   it didn’t have superstars but it had proven vets that checked well all the safe boxes and it was universally agreed the Panthers were putting him into position to succeed. BY just doesn’t fit a traditional O because he isn’t built like a traditional QB.  And he still doesn’t.   CJ Stroud would have had more success here than Bryce with that cast.   CJ just has the tools that fit the NFL more easily.  Young can find success but I have always argued it would take a Bryce centric plan (which we have never attempted IMO) 
×
×
  • Create New...