Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which Analyst Was The Most Accurate


RumHam

Recommended Posts

This is why mock drafts are stupid (and why the serious analysts like Mayock only do them to appease viewers) because it's almost impossible to guess what each GM is going to do and to pick out all the trades. 

How a rational human being should judge these analysts is were they right about the studs and the duds three years from now. This is why I am indifferent about Christian. I didn't waste my time watching hours of tape, but I trust that DG did. If he's Christian ends up being the player we want him to be, then that's success. If mayock and others saw him having success in the next level then that's success. If analysts don't think Trubisky will have success and he does, then that's failure on part of the analysts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's why I want to know, because they are a waste and people take them too seriously. Kiper sat there in disgust last night not talking because he wasn't remotely close. He put a Linebacker with shoulder issues at #5. Anyone can be "opinionated" but it would help if someone was credible. I almost think the teams do this on purpose now despite the media. When they all talked about Chicago taking Solomon Thomas at #2, every casual knew it was for a QB. People just couldn't believe it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, RumHam said:

Kiper missed on like 75% of his picks. He seriously doesn't deserve a job. Anyways, who or where seemed to be the most accurate in the first round?

If he hit on 25% that would make him the most accurate. I think I read mayock only hit on 2 players. Garrett and McCaffrey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, RumHam said:

Kiper missed on like 75% of his picks. He seriously doesn't deserve a job. Anyways, who or where seemed to be the most accurate in the first round?

First time watching the draft eh? he misses on like 75% every year, he knows a lot about every player and thats why he is who he is, not for getting the picks right cause he never does

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

For those saying Mayock, Mayock is actually one of the worse mock draft analyst out there. Kiper is actually more accurate 

Actually untrue. Until this year, when everyone struggled, Mayock was top 5 in Mock Draft accuracy. Jason Boris, the 2nd most accurate mock drafter, until this year, only got 3 right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mocks are fun, but expecting them to actually be accurate is an exercise in futility. Just far too many variables with hundreds of prospects, different opinions within the same room (scout opinions vary a lot compared to media groupthink), trades, positional value assessments, etc. Getting the exact slot for 32 players correct is akin to getting 100% on your March Madness bracket.

But to answer your question: the top media guy from the first round was Marino from NDT, who got only 9 picks "right." That's 72% wrong, so there's only a 3% gap (or one correct pick) between the top guy and "how does this guy have a job?"

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce has been in the NFL 3 years and still looks like a very mediocre QB. Most games are nothing but mediocre plays with a highlight reel every now and then.  He is a very INCONSISTENT QB and it’s very fustrating. He does not deserve a 5th year option, even though the Panthers and all the dumb asses in the front office will give it to him.
    • I’ve rarely ever been more sure of anything than losing out — but how can anyone say with a straight face “Bryce hasn’t improved, but Canales has and he’s masks his flaws”. You have to be so out of touch with reality to put one way above the other when discussing those two. 
    • Last night was the classic example of a visiting team just holding on through the wave of emotion a home team has at the start of a big time game. Bama’s first two kickoff returns really set them back as far as playcalling and allowed OU to dictate field position. The emotion of the home crowd fed into what OU was doing at that point, and it felt like Bama would not be able to overcome that.     Once the kickoff returner was told to fair catch every kick, the game shifted, as Bama wasn’t starting each drive inside their own 15. It was then that Bama was able to make some plays, outscoring OU 34-7 the rest of the way.  I think the last 3/4 of the game proves Bama was the better team. OU was just able to ride the initial wave of emotion to a big lead, but Bama held on just enough.  However, had OU blocked the punt on Bama’s second drive and scored a TD (vice a FG on the ensuing drive), things likely would have been different.  Anyway, Roll Tide!
×
×
  • Create New...