Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

And another one. Thomas Davis wants a contract extension before Training Camp.


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

I feel you, but I don't think either player is looking at the Kalil situation and using it as motivation for their personal contract negotiations. This is solely about their own situations and desires/reasons for wanting new deals. Their (TD and GO) situations are also very different. 



Oh I am sure they are not. From their perspective, I doubt they begrudge most other players getting paid. I wouldn't if I was a player.

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, thebigcat said:

I like TD, arguably the greatest Panther of all time and a true gentleman (took pictures with my boys recently). But this is where the illusion and grandeur stops, this business is where it is a privilege and not a right to earn your spot and contract. It was "sentimental" deals that have made this team 20+ years of average at best without ever posting back to back winning seasons.

 

If the team thinks TD can contribute and at a salary that justifies his market rate then certainly would welcome him to stay, but if the coaching staff thinks his replacement is ready and he is not ready to play second fiddle or play at a contract that represents his value then a nice public announcement about his time with the Panthers and allow him to explore the market. 

 

If Joe Montana can play for the Chiefs, Jordan for the Wizards, Emmitt for the Cardinals then TD can finish his career as a Jet as far as I am concerned if his value/production are not in line with the Carolina Panthers, any athlete at some point of their career is expendable.

Michael Jordan retired from the Bulls then came back to play for the Wizards, completely different situation 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeahhhh I love TD, and wish he could stay forever.  But it's a risk every time he's on the field and Shaq is (hopefully) about to explode onto the scene.  DG can hopefully get tricky with an extension ...voidable years, inventive laden, whatever.  But a few years with high guarantees?  That's a way to quickly break this team up, and lose a couple young core guys. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, RoaringRiot said:

I feel you, but I don't think either player is looking at the Kalil situation and using it as motivation for their personal contract negotiations. This is solely about their own situations and desires/reasons for wanting new deals. Their (TD and GO) situations are also very different. 

So if its not the context of the Kalil contract what has led 2 of the most consistent Panthers in recent years to suddenly look for commitment/money from the organisation at exactly the same time, just prior to training camp? Coincidence? Or maybe they didn't realize that numerous other key players contracts are up this year? C'mon. They are both too professional to come out and say as much, but surely such a contract would put their team friendly deals in a different light in their minds? You honestly can't see any connection? Of course we had to sign an LT. And of course it was a bad year to do it. But that doesn't mean that contract was great value or that it doesn't have a domino affect on the cap and other players negotiations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SeoulPanther said:

So if its not the context of the Kalil contract what has led 2 of the most consistent Panthers in recent years to suddenly look for commitment/money from the organisation at exactly the same time, just prior to training camp? Coincidence? Or maybe they didn't realize that numerous other key players contracts are up this year? C'mon. They are both too professional to come out and say as much, but surely such a contract would put their team friendly deals in a different light in their minds? You honestly can't see any connection? Of course we had to sign an LT. And of course it was a bad year to do it. But that doesn't mean that contract was great value or that it doesn't have a domino affect on the cap and other players negotiations. 

One is a top two TE getting paid as the number seven and getting close to the end of his career. 

The other is in the final year of his deal coming off a Pro Bowl season who still thinks he can produce at that level.

Kalil's contact has nothing to do with it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Yes and they are getting underpaid because they took team friendly deals. And the Kalil contract should make them question those deals. I guess we can agree to disagree on the motivation and timing for their demands and we will never know definitively either way. But factual outcomes of the Kalil contract are:

  1: It used up cap space which has a knock on effect on money available for other negotiations.

That's irrevocable. By overpaying we have greater risk of losing a key player.

  2: Players use other contracts given out as indicators for the value they receive.

Thus the bar is raised. That's bad enough when you have star, Norwell, and Turner lining up to be paid but worse when your team leaders start agitating for more money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can say with the most certainty that TD and Olsen didn't look at Matt Kalil's contract and decide that they wanted more money because of what he is getting paid. These dudes aren't petty. Both of them have legitimate arguments - Olsen has way out performed his contract and TD is in his final year - for wanting/deserving more money. It's that black and white. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both TD and Greg have had top 8 contracts in the league the last two seasons. Why would anyone consider those "team friendly" deals? 

Outside of Tom Brady is there really such a thing as a player signing a team friendly deal? A major player? I can't think of any but I'm trying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RoaringRiot said:

Both TD and Greg have had top 8 contracts in the league the last two seasons. Why would anyone consider those "team friendly" deals? 

Outside of Tom Brady is there really such a thing as a player signing a team friendly deal? A major player? I can't think of any but I'm trying. 

Here's why. Because Olsen has been at worst top 2. 3 successive 1000 yard seasons. And hes obviously carried the panthers receiving. And Davis although not HOF has been the soul of our D for years. They could have got more. Now you can say they undersold themselves or that they took a team friendly deal as you like. But then you bring in a guy who has been a contender for THE WORST LT in the NFL since his rookie season and waaay overpay him. And you think that they won't be bothered by that?

Try looking at Raiders Carr if you want a recent example. He could have taken more than 25 per. But he didn't on the promise that they would secure the LG. Which has subsequently happened. You can argue that  25 isn't especially team friendly. Especially compared to say Brady. But the point is every contract has a subsequent knock on effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, SeoulPanther said:

Here's why. Because Olsen has been at worst top 2. 3 successive 1000 yard seasons. And hes obviously carried the panthers receiving. And Davis although not HOF has been the soul of our D for years. They could have got more. Now you can say they undersold themselves or that they took a team friendly deal as you like. But then you bring in a guy who has been a contender for THE WORST LT in the NFL since his rookie season and waaay overpay him. And you think that they won't be bothered by that?

Try looking at Raiders Carr if you want a recent example. He could have taken more than 25 per. But he didn't on the promise that they would secure the LG. Which has subsequently happened. You can argue that  25 isn't especially team friendly. Especially compared to say Brady. But the point is every contract has a subsequent knock on effect.

Couple things....

You can't count Olsen's 3rd year of 1000 yards since it was after he signed the contract. When he signed his new deal he was basically tied for the 4th highest TE salary behind Gronk (he should be), Graham (was dominate at the time of his contract but I'd take Olsen now), and Thomas (Jags have to overpay). So you can argue that he took a "team friendly" deal or that he could have gotten more, but being paid top four TE money is a pretty fair deal for him. Your point of him having 3 years in a row and carrying the Panthers' offense are actually the exact reasons he wants a new deal - not because of Kalil. 

TD is being paid like a top 10 OLB. Seems pretty fair, especially considering his injury history. TD wants more years. 

Neither one of their contracts were "team friendly" or undersold their value. They were (at the time) very fair contracts. 

I'm not sure you really understand the Kalil contract very well. For starters, LT contracts are some of the highest in the league other than QBs. If you compare what Kalil got in relation to Reiff (who replaced him) and Okung then it's comparable to the market value - those two guys graded slightly higher than Kalil (none have been great but the demand for LT is high). Kalil's cap his this year is ~$4M and ~$6.75 next season. The Panthers can dump him after 2018 with ~$7M in dead cap space that can be spread out over a couple of seasons. That is far from "waaaay" overpaying him. If Kalil plays out his contract then that means he's played well, protected Cam for many years, we're more than likely winning, and the ~$15/m a year will actually be a bargain in 2021.

But back to my point....TD and Olsen both have strong arguments as to why they deserve new contracts. This is solely based on their performances and the importance of their roles to the team. They're not looking at Kalil and thinking "hey that guy sucks and got a ton of money so I deserve more money" as you suggest. That sounds ridiculous to even type. 

And I'm happy to agree to disagree, but if you're going to keep saying "they could have taken more" or that they're "bothered that a sucky Kalil got a big contract", can you back that up with some facts? Or is that just your assumption that you're pushing? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you give a deal to a player in his mid thirties, you better look forward instead of back.  I love TD---he might be my favorite panther ever, but his is starting to slow down, his role will be limited, and I think his best fit might be as a backup, situational player.  So, if he wants another year, it needs to be near closer to vet min than his current numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is something that has irritated me for a while. I'm going to address his play during these "game winning drives," 8 of them apparently, clear up some nomenclature, and address some points specifically. The games in question.  Also responding to this  What is a Game Winning Drive? This is an undefined term and therefore can be whatever the person using it wants it to be. The term itself removes context from a result which lends itself to be used by people arguing in bad faith. Some people like to attribute every time Bryce is on the field in a situation like this to him "winning the game," or just kind of associating him with a "Game Winning Drive" and leaving it open ended. There's no criteria for what a GWD is. If you had a spectrum of what this could encompass it, on one end you'd have a single player being responsible, and on the other you'd have all 11. Put another way, a QB going 9/9 for 99 yards and rushing the final yard himself is on one end of the spectrum, and on the other is the blocking tight end who was just kinda there. Hey, he was on the field too.  For these purposes, I'm going to hedge and say a GWD is something you know when you see it. I'm not going to claim Bryce hasn't had one, but I'm absolutely not going to give him credit for every one of them. Reasonable people can disagree at the margins, but generally I think we'll be in accord more than not. I also want to look at the context of these, because I think we need to keep in mind how the team got to that position. There's a certain "mystique" about the term game winning drive. Like all of a sudden, when the game is on the line, the QB just turns it on and becomes a better player and blah blah blah. Nothing else matters because he Just Wins Games It neatly ignores the circumstances that led to a team needing a last second drive against some of the worst teams in the league, and this should be taken into consideration. This was an argument made in favor of Delhomme for years...until a certain game that we won't mention.  In reality, defenses are tired by the end of the game, defensive coordinators will generally give up yards in exchange for clock, and offensive playcallers will be more aggressive. That's really it.  But Fiz, why now? Why tonight? People are building this narrative about Bryce Young because it allows them to overlook the rest of his performance, his role in getting the team into whatever hole they're trying to crawl out of, and minimizing the contributions of everyone else (or assigning blame to players other than him) to make him look like he's better than he is/being let down. People in the national media with motivations I can only speculate on are doing this and it's irritating. Also it's very slow at work tonight and it's either this or reruns of ER.  I'll be looking at the final drives here (more or less) when the Panthers were in a position to win or tie. I'll also be adding some context as a I go. So lets just look at these.  2023 Houston at Carolina - 5/10 41 yds, FG  The Panthers drove to the Houston 44, then ran it 6 times in a row for the final 12 yards before the Texans started diving offsides. Panthers weren't just killing clock; Bryce had already taken one sack on the drive (six on the day!), and I don't think any of us feel like Pineiro had a 60 yarder in him in 2023. He did have 5 FG in him though, which is all the scoring the Panthers could muster. It was enough.  Game Winning Drive: eh, Bryce didn't really cover himself in glory here. If you think getting the team into range for a 60 yard attempt before letting the RB finish the job is a GWD, then we're going to have some problems. I'm generally kinda dubious of the whole "wow he set up a long range field goal for the win what a legend." Why yes early career Tom Brady was a fraud carried by Adam Vinatieri why do you ask  Atlanta at Carolina - 5/6 53 yds, GW FG Game Winning Drive: yeah, I think so. It was a miserable 9-6 win against the Desmond Ridder led Atlanta Falcons. Prior to this final drive, Bryce was a whopping 13/18 for 114 yds and the offense had managed 6 whole points. Hard for me to say here they weren't in the position to need a GWD because of how ineffective Bryce was. That said, I think it's fair he did this one on his own. Credit where credit's due little guy, you did it.  2024 New Orleans at Carolina - 1/4, 38 yds Game Winning Drive: not really. Panthers win 23-22. Sanders scored from 16 yards out on the ground, Carolina was only there because of a DPI (a theme with Bryce), Bryce took a sack on the 2 point conversion, and then the defense stopped the Saints afterwards. Prior to this Bryce had a very Bryce esque 15/22 133 1 Td 1 Int performance going so he was just kinda there.  Again, this is where context comes into play. Completing 1/4 passes does not "leading a game winning drive" make. If that's the dividing line, everyone on the field led a GWD, so the term becomes meaningless.  Carolina at Giants - 0/0  Game Winning Drive: no matter what a GWD is, it's certainly not this, and if anyone argues differently you can disregard them. Daniel Jones fumbled on the first play of overtime, Panthers ran a couple times and kicked the game winning FG. Prior to this, Bryce was terrible. Panthers were up 17-7 with 5:31 in the 3rd quarter, on the back of Chuba. From that point on, Bryce went 2/6 for 14 yards. Panthers had two 3 and outs and got just 2 first downs. Panthers overcame him here.  Arizona at Carolina - 0/0 Game Winning Drive: no. On the panthers second possession in overtime, Chuba ran it twice for 49 yards and a TD. On their first possession, Bryce completed a 1 yard checkdown, took a sack, and the Panthers punted after totaling -4 yards. Furthermore, Bryce couldn't convert a 3rd and 3 at the 2 minute warning up 3 points. Arizona got the ball back and tied the game.  Carolina at Atlanta - 5/5, 71 yards  Game Winning Drive: sure whatever have a day. For context, it's generally accepted in Atlanta sports media the defense was trying get the coordinator fired that day, which he was. I was at the game. I'm not saying the players had a conspiracy, but I'm not sure how it would look different if they did. but hey, as long as weird poo keeps happening against the Falcons, let it ride.  Miami at Carolina - 3/5, 45 yards, TD  Game Winning Drive: yes BUT. I don't want to re-litigate this. Briefly, the Dolphins have a historically bad defense, the Panthers were only trailing because of how badly Bryce played, the defense bailed the team out, and Rico was clearly the MVP. Trying to sneak this into a narrative about Bryce and his game winning drives is an attempt to hide how completely dogshit he was for most of the game. On second half drives to start, Bryce went.... 0/1 passing, took a sack, FG 2/3 passing, 18 yards, Delay of Game on Bryce, punt 2/2 passing, 16 yards, took a sack, punt  1/3 passing, 4 yards, punt  1/1 passing, 4 yds, 2 defensive penalties, 43 yd run by Rico, 1 yd TD run Absolutely dismal performance Dallas at Carolina - 3/6, 25 yards, FG  Game Winning Drive: Panthers had 34 yards rushing on this drive, and Rico rushed for more yards on the day than Bryce threw. People will want to point to the 7 yard slant to Renfrow, but that's one moment. Why do you need a 4th down conversion to kick a game winning FG against the worst defense in the league? The Renfrow catch is just as meaningful as the DPI (again) on 3rd and 7. Hard for me to say yeah Bryce gets credit for this and Rico doesn't. or Ryan Fitzgerald. People aren't going to be telling stories about where they were when Bryce got 25 yards passing to set up a 30 yard FG to beat the worst defense in the league.  Conclusion I'd say low end 3, high end 6 for what I'd actually credit Bryce for with having a game winning drive. Absolutely not for the Giants and Cardinals game. Saints game probably not.  As far as questioning which games need a GWD because of Bryce, I'd argue Miami, New York, 2023 Atlanta, and Houston definitely. League average QB play and you don't need the heroics. Bryce had multiple chances to seal the game against the Cardinals in 2024 and couldn't do it. The defense picked off the Cardinals late in the 4th quarter at their 11 yard line after the Panthers went 3 and out, including a classic Bryce check down short of the line to gain on 3rd.  About half of the time, it looks like these GWD, whomever is responsible for them, are happening in part because of what Bryce did or didn't do. I don't think league average QB play is too much to ask for. Panthers usually win these games despite of Bryce; he's an obstacle to be overcome.  Stats Taken in totality, in these situations Bryce's stats are  7 games 17/26 passing for 233, 1 TD  65% completion rating  13 ypc 8.9 ypa I'm not going to compare this to league average, I'm just going to point out you'd expect someone with 8 GWD to have more than 1 TD.  Other side of this  but what about the games in a similar situation where they DIDN'T win? Shouldn't we look at those games too? Maybe find ones where Bryce absolutely lost the game with a pick, or calling an audible into the wrong play, or spiking the ball with zero seconds on the clock after throwing into the middle of the field, or all of the turnover on downs? Maybe also go into some of the games that have been mythologized, like the Eagles game that ended on a turnover on downs where Bryce had 3rd and 4 in Eagles territory and couldn't get a first down? Yeah...someone should do that...
    • Best RB tandem in Panther history (at least for a few weeks)
×
×
  • Create New...