Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Strength of Schedule: Ridiculously Easier For Our Offense; Not Too Different (Still Difficult) For Our Defense


Saca312

Recommended Posts

So, I went through twitter recently and saw something very interesting. The Panthers have a middle-of-the-pack SoS overall, but when you break it down, it's actually of two extremes:

View image on Twitter

The Panthers offense has a super easy schedule. It's not even funny.

  • Passing -  The Panthers go against the 24th hardest schedule against pass rush defenses (17th in 2016), 30th hardest in pass defense efficiency (6th in 2016), and 32nd hardest in yards per pass allowed (21st in 2016). 
  • Rushing - The Panthers go against the 32nd hardest schedule against run defenses (28th in 2016) and 29th hardest in RB pass efficiency (25th in 2016). 
  • Red Zone Efficiency - The Panthers go against the 31st hardest red zone defenses (29th in 2016), and 20th hardest against 3rd down conversion prevention defenses (19th in 2016).

The Panthers offense has the easiest schedule in the NFL, and it's not even close. That should bode really well for our new offensive scheme and future. Cam Newton should be pressured less, and our wide receivers will have much easier competition in comparison to last year. Our rookies should also shine against the easier competition.

Expect a lot of points to be scored.

Defensively, it's a lot tougher in comparison to our offense, but not significantly different from last year. 

  • Passing - The Panthers go against the 2nd hardest schedule against pass efficient offenses (7th in 2016), 2nd hardest in Yards Per Pass Attempt (3rd in 2016), but do get to go against slightly easier pass protecting offenses (6th hardest in 2017; 4th in 2016).
  • Rushing - The Panthers go against the 1st hardest schedule against rushing efficient offenses (21st in 2016), 1st hardest against RB pass efficient offenses (1st in 2016), but remain at 32nd hardest going against explosive rushing offenses (same as 2016). 
  • Red Zone Efficiency -  The Panthers defense go against the 1st hardest schedule against red-zone offenses (3rd in 2016), and the 2nd hardest against 3rd down converting offenses (5th in 2016).

Not too different from last year. Still will be going against some tough offenses, but it's not too much of an extreme difference. Consider also the fact the Panthers defense should be much better than it was last year. I wouldn't worry much about our defense.

So, what are your thoughts? Think this gives you a bit more confidence our team can do really well next year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically when we win the Superbowl everyone is going to bitch that we had an easy schedule and not give us our respect. 

Kidding. But usually strength of schedule goes to hell by the time week 4 starts. Players get hurt and teams end up not being as good or bad as advertised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OneBadCat said:

So basically when we win the Superbowl everyone is going to bitch that we had an easy schedule and not give us our respect. 

Well if we win the Superbowl chances are we beat the fug out of the Patriots.

No one's gonna bitch about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SoS doesn't mean much to me. 

The best defense against good offenses, literally is an offense that can sustain drives, keeping the opposing team on the sideline, and keeping our defense rested.

If we can do that, our defense should be  able to create turnovers, getting the ball back in the hands of our offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would rather face great defenses and terrible offenses.  It would suck to ride a historic offense into the Superbowl and end up blowing a 28-3 lead just because our offense couldn't move the ball when it suddenly counted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Cyberjag said:

I would rather face great defenses and terrible offenses.  It would suck to ride a historic offense into the Superbowl and end up blowing a 28-3 lead just because our offense couldn't move the ball when it suddenly counted.

Hard for your offense to move the ball when their on the sideline. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it gives me any more or less confidence that we'll do well this year. 

I guess because I don't put too awful much weight into SoS.  Mainly because there is so much parody in the NFL these days from year to year (with the exception of the GD Pats, would be amazing to see them finish with a below .500 record, but I digress).

But hey with that being said, I don't mind talking about it / looking at a fairly busy graphic because ya know....it's July and all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't we have a lot of success in 2015 because we played against some of the worst pass rushing teams for most of the season? Even with Oher and Remmers, Cam had time to survey the field consistently. If we can have the same good fortune this season I will be excited to see what the offense can accomplish.

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mistuh Jones said:

You can't salvage that, dude. Don't even try. "Ball4TwoQuarters"

Patriots offensive snaps = 93 Falcons offensive snaps = 46. Brady had 62 pass attempts himself. What exactly am I trying to salvage? Falcons defense wore down in the 2nd half. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rumors are the team is in fact done with Ikem. So it was going to be a LT, just depended on which one got to them at 19. 
    • I have not read the entire thread, and I realize this is fluff to a degree, but it was recorded in real time.  Here are 10 things that stood out to me: 1. Morgan wrote down (before day 3) the first three day 3 picks.  (Lee, Hecht, and Wheatley).  I was never fond of the Morgan hiring as GM.  I thought he was a lazy selection and I questioned his ability to match wits with some of the best GMs in the NFL.  Not any more. Morgan OWNED this draft.  He knew which players were good fits and when they would be bargains, and he got bargains.  I am thoroughly excited about every player. 2. Canales said (about Hecht, a 5th rounder):  "He has a real chance to start."   Morgan said the same thing about Freeling. While I do not expect either to start day 1, it looks to me like we drafted 40% of our starting OL in 2026.  I think we will sign Ickey to a deal and play him at RG, allowing us to escape the Robert Hunt contract in 2027.  Of course that is conditional, and Ickey could replace Moton instead, but if he fully recovers, we are looking at a better RG/RT than he was a LT--which was average.  3. When Morgan said to second-round DT Hunter, "Ready to play beside Derrick Brown?"  Based on personalities, one calm and soft spoken (for the Most part, Brown is) and the other talkative and openly enthusiastic, it reminded me of Brentson Buckner and Kris Jenkins.   4.  Perhaps the steal of the draft was Tennessee WR Chris Brazzell II.  Clearly the Panthers felt that they passed on him when they took Hunter in round 2.  They mentioned his skill set (able to attack on "all three levels.")  This sent me back to watching film. He has speed, hands, and he produced without a great QB. I think he could be great in the NFL.  When  5. Tepper was a bit more involved than I would like, but he seems to be very confident in Morgan.  If I were the owner, I would be doing the same thing.  Canales was also somewhat of a background character--everyone understood his role and stayed in his lane.   6.  I am also very interested in the quantitative analytics aspect of the draft room.  (something like, "He has a 94% chance of being there at pick 55, and a 38% chance of being there at 87). I would like to know their formula, because it seemed to be spot on. 7.  BPA?  Not really.  They had a shopping list and seemed to be targeting the players they selected. I realize other players were edited out, but I was impressed how they knew, by round, who they wanted and if there were multiple options sitting there, they traded back. 8.  Evero (I think) called Lee a candidate that would serve as the "#3 CB."  Morgan describes his size as a plus (Long). Strong praise for a 4th rounder.  If so, we have Thornton coming off injury who played well as an UDFA rookie and they will battle it out to become Jackson's replacement after the 2026 season, assuming the Panthers do not extend him (he turns 30 in 7 months.O 9.  I think we could realistically see every one of these draft picks play this season, and I believe most could start by next year--Realistically, Freeling, Hunter, Hecht, and Brazzell could all be starting or key rotational pieces this year.  I see Lee and Wheatley getting special teams reps and both could be used this season more than expected.   10.  Kuwatch seemed to be predetermined with the final pick, probably because he can add something special to special teams.   He and Bam Martin Scott will fight it out for the 4th ILB position, so it will probably come down to special teams--and Kuwatch stands out there.  Imagine an ILB with a 46.5 vertical (not a typo) on the FG block team.  Kuwatch has an 8.85 RAS score vs. Martin-Scott's 7.5.  
    • They did mention Bain as the pick if he fell but didnt seem confident that would be the case. 
×
×
  • Create New...