Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The offensive "evolution"


ladypanther

Recommended Posts

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article164804707.html

Quote

 

Our offense is what we run, it’s been what we’ve run for the last five, six years,” said Panthers tight end Greg Olsen. “We don’t re-invent ourselves every year. There are always little wrinkles, little nuances that we address in the offseason.”

When a team has had the continuity the Panthers have had, especially at quarterback and head coach, said Olsen, an “overhaul” like the one the outside perspective imagined the Panthers would implement is just not realistic.
“I don’t think you overhaul,” said Olsen. “I think a lot has been made of that this season. Any team that is not constantly moving forward to get better – whether that word is ‘evolve’ or whatever the word is, teams that get stuck doing just what they’ve done in the past, whether they’ve had success or not, are going to fall behind in this league.”

 

 
Quote

 

“There will be times when (offensive changes) will be very subtle,” head coach Ron Rivera said to the Observer and live on WFNZ on Tuesday morning. “And you have to pay attention. There will be times when it’s very obvious.”

Countering the trend of mobile, athletic, “floating” hybrid defensive players with players such as McCaffrey, brought in specifically to mismatch with linebackers, certainly qualifies as progressive. When linebackers, nickel backs and defensive backs commit to tracking McCaffrey, playmakers such as Olsen are given more space to, well, make plays.

“If you’re not constantly challenging yourself to get better, if you’re not challenging yourself as an individual and as an offense to progress, do things differently and keep defenses off balance, the defenses in this league are just too good,” said Olsen. “They’ll tee off on you pretty fast. You have to keep those guys on their heels.

“I think that’s just the natural evolution of offensive football in this league.

 

I like this part....

Quote

 

Olsen believes he saw this put into action in Tuesday’s practice.

McCaffrey was lined up as an outside receiver, then motioned a few feet inward as the defense’s tone became urgent in calling checks to stay aware of his positioning. Olsen was lined up as a receiver just inside of McCaffrey, and as McCaffrey cut inside, Olsen cut outward.

A linebacker and a defensive back bit on McCaffrey, and by the time the latter realized his man was in the back corner of the end zone, the ball was cradled safely in Olsen’s arms for a touchdown.

The alignment was subtle. But it was clear in the voices and body language of the defenders that keying in on McCaffrey was crucial. The same will be true for second-round pick, receiver Curtis Samuel, once he is healthy.

“I think some of that stuff we did it today in the red zone with (McCaffrey) on the same side ... he’s a guy that is going to attract attention,” said Olsen.

“There’s not a lot of space. We can’t always throw the ball 100 yards. We’ve got to find some levels out there. And he catches a few of those balls out of the backfield, and those (linebackers and defensive backs) have to come up and tackle him, well, next time they’re going to play a little closer. ... That opens up things (downfield).”

Opens them up, and moves them forward.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That interview was a fast reality check ...was wondering if a thread would be made. 

He should take a few pages from Chud'z book. Dude was a magician at utilizing/involving the rb in the passing game. 

Just like Cam carried Shula's old offense, Mccaffrey & Cam will carry the new. You don't draft Mccaffrey @ #8 without planning to force touches. He will see ALOT of action this season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like we're always playing checkers while the real contenders like New England, Pitt, Seattle, and Greenbay are playing chess. If this season crashes and burns and we don't make it back to the playoffs it will surely mark the end of the Rivera/Shula era, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lot's of overreacting here. There are a lot of things they can do within the system they already have just by adding wrinkles and changing up formations. Simple things like lining CMC up wide changes how the defense is going to cover and adds another play making target to a play they already run all the time. It's a small change that makes a big difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Nate Dogg said:

Seems like we're always playing checkers while the real contenders like New England, Pitt, Seattle, and Greenbay are playing chess. If this season crashes and burns and we don't make it back to the playoffs it will surely mark the end of the Rivera/Shula era, right?

I think we're gonna see "Riverboat Ron" again this year, he along with Shula and maybe others on the staff have to be feeling pressure to make a serious playoff run this year... they have one of the best qb's in the League when properly utilized, playmakers thru out the offense and what looks to be a very good defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In another post, Snow says about three years before you can properly grade a rookie class.  Sounds about right…
    • And this reiterates why I don’t want a Young contract extension. Please let us find another QB. 
    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
×
×
  • Create New...