Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe P's Roster Projection


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

I think so too. Tons of experience. Also, not sure if any money is saved by cutting him at this point?

We wont cut Lee. The reason he didn't put yesterday was that we are showcasing Palardy to other teams. Michael Palardy is a good, young, cheap punter that has trade value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

I think so too. Tons of experience. Also, not sure if any money is saved by cutting him at this point?

No money would be saved at all after he took the pay cut recently and got more guaranteed. That sealed his spot as our punter. Palardy could fetch us a conditional 6th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

No money would be saved at all after he took the pay cut recently and got more guaranteed. That sealed his spot as our punter. Palardy could fetch us a conditional 6th.

Even a 7th rounder would be nice for a player we're going to cut in 2 weeks. A team like Arizona could be an option. They have Leone and Wile who have not impressed so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ncfan said:

This!

Remember we traded a 4th for Lee and a 7th

And good GM should easily get a 6th for him minimum.

   Lee has been one of the best punters ever. 

  Palardy has been below average for half a season. 

  No GM is going to give a 6th for a below average P. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Malcom Spence is the best player remaining, hope he’s there.
    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
×
×
  • Create New...