Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dickson


morgan55

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

there is obviously a timing issue. Maybe Dickson is stopping on his routes and not expecting a pass. Something they need to get worked out

There's no way anyone can try to put it on Dickson these past two games. Cam's overthrows were absolute sh*t. No excuses for Cam on those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ed is #1, Manhertz moves to #2, Promote Armah to #3 / FB and hope for the best. 

Even a trade or FA wouldn't solve anything short term. Maybe Barnidge, since there's some familiarity, but I wouldn't count on it. 

Time to get the most out of our hybrid players. Can someone kidnap Shula tho?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheRed said:

Dickson is a mediocre third string TE at best.

We have taken Olsen for granted, and now we are backed into a corner with our #1 receiver out while we stockpiled DT's and LB's in the first round the last several seasons.

You can't have it both ways.

Well, so far it's been going every way other than in the bread basket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, TheRed said:

Dickson is a mediocre third string TE at best.

We have taken Olsen for granted, and now we are backed into a corner with our #1 receiver out while we stockpiled DT's and LB's in the first round the last several seasons.

You can't have it both ways.

Thats a steaming pile of hot poo. Dickson has been a solid #2 TE since hes got here and was decent in Baltimore. He is not olsen, nor a pro bowler but I think he can get the job done. The question is who fills in for dicksons previous role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...