Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Score (LOL): 5 teams that are likely already regretting their big-name FA signing


top dawg

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, rodeo said:

did they seriously? "Listen it's a process, Cam just needs to develop some chemistry so he knows when the defensive end is about to run full speed untouched into his blind side. You might even say this is Cam's fault."

to be fair, rivera said it was more kalil needing to get on the same page with newton. basically it's newton's offense and kalil needs to get in sync with him.

wasn't newton's issue. it was kalil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Its one game against one of the better dline's around.  

I don't think he was as that great against the 49ers. But, in any event, if he doesn't get better then we will not be getting a Lombardi this year. The better lines with the more balanced teams on both sides of the ball are generally the ones that you meet in the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

Yeah, I can't blame Gettleman for signing Kalil given we HAD to do something. There was always a risk it wouldn't work out.

A good portion of the league is struggling to find quality OL, especially tackles. It seems to be a growing concern as far as affecting the overall quality of the NFL product.

It honestly wouldn't surprise me to see the league change the rules to help the OL's out league-wide, similar to the rule changes they made in 1978 that allowed for OL to use extended arms and open hands when blocking.

He could have traded... Kalil was the "big name" out there, but nobody wanted him, not even his own team, viking fans were laughing at us haha 

 

Personally, I would have loved to see a trade for a starting caliber LT, but it is what it is  :'(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I don't think he was as that great against the 49ers. But, in any event, if he doesn't get better then we will not be getting a Lombardi this year. The better lines with the more balanced teams on both sides of the ball are generally the ones that you meet in the playoffs.

Neither Seattle nor Denver's line was anything to write home about when they won the SB.  I think there are a lot of ways to win, and we can probably get away with a few positions being no more than adequate.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I'm still a Rivera guy, but I'm wavering. Coming over to the dark side with @tiger7_88 among many others. My absolute disgust hinges upon River dinghy's hanging on to Shula's left cheek as the tide of modern football tries to sweep him away.

1. Not impressed with young Kalil so far, but still have hope he csn at least become serviceable as pre-concussion Oher, fingers crossed.

2. Yes, if he fails, thats on Gettleman.

3. If you only knew the power of the Dark Side! EMBRACE IT AND LET IT FLOW THROUGH YOU!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Yaboychris28 said:

Lol at the people who thought just because his big brother plays here he will all of the sudden stop sucking 

A lot of people here, the majority IMO, thought signing the horrible RT from Tennessee a couple of years ago was also going to be a huge failure.

And Kalil just might turn out to be exactly that. But we sure as hell don't know that YET.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Neither Seattle nor Denver's line was anything to write home about when they won the SB.  I think there are a lot of ways to win, and we can probably get away with a few positions being no more than adequate.  

I was referring to their D-lines

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

A lot of people here, the majority IMO, thought signing the horrible RT from Tennessee a couple of years ago was also going to be a huge failure.

And Kalil just might turn out to be exactly that. But we sure as hell don't know that YET.

Yeah, but what we do know that he sure as hell ain't worth the money that was given. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that was my beef from the start. Bring him in for three mil on a prove-it deal, and I have no qualms. If you're going to swing for the fences, bring a Louisville Slugger. G-man apparently thought he had one, but turns out that he must have had a whiffle ball bat. Now envision needing a home run, coming up to the plate and connecting with a fuging plastic bat. ROFL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have seen little inclination that they are laying down on him, that I can agree with. I don't think we are going to ever see much in the way of unfiltered opinions in the public realm from his teammates because that's extremely rare and extremely toxic behavior.  It's certainly a positive thing that they support him but, again, that doesn't make a successful NFL starting QB. Playing well on Sunday's does.  That is what has been lacking to date. He is not playing well consistently enough to be considered an NFL starting QB. He has to improve there. Be more consistent. Be more decisive. Make correct decisions more frequently. 
    • That's fine but for every Kurt Warner there are 10 Tony Banks that don't find their spot because....it never really existed.  Jake Browning was on and off practice squad teams for years until he stuck in Cincy. In his limited action over the past two seasons, he has played well enough that the Bengals panic traded for 41 year old Joe Flacco. It's easy to point to outliers like Warner or Purdy or Tom Brady as players who fell through the cracks because....well, they are outliers. The statistics over the long term have never really borne out the argument that every QB is just waiting for their perfect spot and situation. Most of these guys bounce around the league and it just never really clicks anywhere or they become marginal backup QB's. I don't think that exactly an accident. It's tough to be a starting NFL QB and it's why the hunt every offseason is so frantic. There are just so few that do it at a high level. My guess is that a theoretical market for Bryce Young(today) is going to look a lot like that post Chicago Justin Fields market. Not a lot of interest and a late round pick value at the highest. And a lot of that IS going to be his average to below average physical traits. It's extremely tough to be in that range and excel in the NFL. And it's precisely because you DO have to be closer to perfection to make up for the fact that you can't do a lot of the things that the elite to above average starters in this league do. 
    • Im never not impressed by how confidently wrong you are. I've watched probably 200 NFL QBs play live. This talk about Bryce's arm strength is retarded, pure and simple. Bryce can make every throw an NFL QB needs to make in any circumstance. Does he have an arm that makes you go wow all the time? No, but very few QBs truly do. Bryce has plenty of zip on the ball when he wants. That TD to XL was a frozen rope. He throws to the opposite hash and outside all the time with no problem. Bryce's arm is objectively stronger than Cam's post-injury. I've seen both live multiple times and I know. And Cam could still play QB well without his rocket launcher. OPs point remains. QB success relies on a lot of nebulous things. Obviously you dont like Bryce. But his success is not going to be bc he doesn't have the arm strength. Its embarrassing this is a thing. Go to some games and actually educate yourself.  
×
×
  • Create New...