Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Score (LOL): 5 teams that are likely already regretting their big-name FA signing


top dawg

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, rodeo said:

did they seriously? "Listen it's a process, Cam just needs to develop some chemistry so he knows when the defensive end is about to run full speed untouched into his blind side. You might even say this is Cam's fault."

to be fair, rivera said it was more kalil needing to get on the same page with newton. basically it's newton's offense and kalil needs to get in sync with him.

wasn't newton's issue. it was kalil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Its one game against one of the better dline's around.  

I don't think he was as that great against the 49ers. But, in any event, if he doesn't get better then we will not be getting a Lombardi this year. The better lines with the more balanced teams on both sides of the ball are generally the ones that you meet in the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

Yeah, I can't blame Gettleman for signing Kalil given we HAD to do something. There was always a risk it wouldn't work out.

A good portion of the league is struggling to find quality OL, especially tackles. It seems to be a growing concern as far as affecting the overall quality of the NFL product.

It honestly wouldn't surprise me to see the league change the rules to help the OL's out league-wide, similar to the rule changes they made in 1978 that allowed for OL to use extended arms and open hands when blocking.

He could have traded... Kalil was the "big name" out there, but nobody wanted him, not even his own team, viking fans were laughing at us haha 

 

Personally, I would have loved to see a trade for a starting caliber LT, but it is what it is  :'(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I don't think he was as that great against the 49ers. But, in any event, if he doesn't get better then we will not be getting a Lombardi this year. The better lines with the more balanced teams on both sides of the ball are generally the ones that you meet in the playoffs.

Neither Seattle nor Denver's line was anything to write home about when they won the SB.  I think there are a lot of ways to win, and we can probably get away with a few positions being no more than adequate.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I'm still a Rivera guy, but I'm wavering. Coming over to the dark side with @tiger7_88 among many others. My absolute disgust hinges upon River dinghy's hanging on to Shula's left cheek as the tide of modern football tries to sweep him away.

1. Not impressed with young Kalil so far, but still have hope he csn at least become serviceable as pre-concussion Oher, fingers crossed.

2. Yes, if he fails, thats on Gettleman.

3. If you only knew the power of the Dark Side! EMBRACE IT AND LET IT FLOW THROUGH YOU!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Yaboychris28 said:

Lol at the people who thought just because his big brother plays here he will all of the sudden stop sucking 

A lot of people here, the majority IMO, thought signing the horrible RT from Tennessee a couple of years ago was also going to be a huge failure.

And Kalil just might turn out to be exactly that. But we sure as hell don't know that YET.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Neither Seattle nor Denver's line was anything to write home about when they won the SB.  I think there are a lot of ways to win, and we can probably get away with a few positions being no more than adequate.  

I was referring to their D-lines

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

A lot of people here, the majority IMO, thought signing the horrible RT from Tennessee a couple of years ago was also going to be a huge failure.

And Kalil just might turn out to be exactly that. But we sure as hell don't know that YET.

Yeah, but what we do know that he sure as hell ain't worth the money that was given. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that was my beef from the start. Bring him in for three mil on a prove-it deal, and I have no qualms. If you're going to swing for the fences, bring a Louisville Slugger. G-man apparently thought he had one, but turns out that he must have had a whiffle ball bat. Now envision needing a home run, coming up to the plate and connecting with a fuging plastic bat. ROFL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...