Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SCARY MOVIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

On ‎9‎/‎20‎/‎2017 at 7:43 AM, Dex said:

The Babadook (haven't seen but have heard good things)

I thought The Babadook was ugh. Boring and silly and way overhyped. I mean not unwatchable bad but just not satisfying in any way and I was waiting for it to be finished.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Cary Kollins said:

 

Several in that list I've been meaning to see.

Green Room is nuts.

Liked Green Room.  You may not like all those on that list...but I like bad horror movies for the most part as well.  It has to be really, really bad for me to hate it.  Exception would be Nightmare on Elm Street movies.  Just never liked em.  The first one was ok, the rest I hated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Thankskilling movies are...ummmm...different. If you go in with no expectations you'll be laughing as you shout at the tv what in the actual fug is going on? Just plain strange movies.

Also it goes from 1 to 3. There is no 2 but the movie Thankskilling 2 is mentioned in 3. It's just insanity.

thankskilling_movie_poster.jpg.55ddc5de2fef6b25d475494264a89cc3.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of great suggestions, but a precious few that are missing:

Judging from the OP @Jeremy Igo I'm thinking you'd enjoy some stylized schlock and mayhem features:

Feast, Slither, Ginger Snaps, Shaun of the Dead

If you are looking for something in the vein of straight creepy as hell and stick with you:

Audition (nothing else out there like it), Inside

For gore-fests:

High Tension, Re-Animator, Hellraiser, The Fly (remake), Hostel

Standard fare (NONE OF THE SEQUELS):

Candyman, Silent Hill, Dawn of the Dead (Remake), The Mist, 30 Days of Night

Double-Mentions (mentioned in the thread previously but deserving of another shout):

Event Horizon, Cabin in the Woods, Trick'r'Treat (2007), Get Out, Evil Dead, Return of the Living Dead, The Thing, Wolf Creek

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, twylyght said:

Lots of great suggestions, but a precious few that are missing:

Judging from the OP (@JeremyIgo) I'm thinking you'd enjoy some stylized schlock and mayhem features:

Feast, Slither, Ginger Snaps, Shaun of the Dead

If you are looking for something in the vein of straight creepy as hell and stick with you:

Audition (nothing else out there like it), Inside

For gore-fests:

High Tension, Re-Animator, Hellraiser, The Fly (remake), Hostel

Standard fare (NONE OF THE SEQUELS):

Candyman, Silent Hill, Dawn of the Dead (Remake), The Mist, 30 Days of Night

Double-Mentions (mentioned in the thread previously but deserving of another shout):

Event Horizon, Cabin in the Woods, Trick'r'Treat (2007), Get Out, Evil Dead, Return of the Living Dead, The Thing, Wolf Creek

Can't find a bad one on that list.  I need to see Inside.  Well played!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moorgan said:

I thought The Babadook was ugh. Boring and silly and way overhyped. I mean not unwatchable bad but just not satisfying in any way and I was waiting for it to be finished.

I really liked The Babadook but the ending was just a real let down IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎9‎/‎20‎/‎2017 at 9:05 AM, Cary Kollins said:

Wolf Creek - 2005 Australian horror/thriller summed up best by this Empire quote "a grimy gut-chiller that unsettles as much as it thrills, violently shunting you to the edge of your seat before clamping onto your memory like a rusty mantrap". Don't be fooled by the 53% RT score, the negative reviews were from critics calling it too hardcore and lifelike.

I was going to recommend Wolf Creek here - you beat me too it - definitely about a 9 1/2 on the creepy scale out of 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He had games where he was a top 10 QB that week, vs Saints, Falcons, Eagles, Chiefs, Bucs.  Amazing performances that I think show what he can do consistently.  
    • We both know there's more that goes into batted passes than just the height of the QB. Most people here have readily acknowledged this and there were numerous discussions about it before we drafted Young. But if you are presenting a POV that Bryce's height hasn't tied to issues with his footwork then there's nothing anyone is going to be able to say to sway you and you know this. Even beyond the footwork I recall a redzone play where Bryce couldn't see around his right tackle at all where a receiver was waiting practically alone in the end zone for a touchdown. There are real world circumstances that are going to show up over the course of the upcoming season and it's up to Bryce and Dave Canales to make adjustments and do anything they can to mitigate negative instances and yes that begins with Bryce's footwork again. Thanks for your time. Have a nice weekend.
    • I'm arguing that should those supposed deficiencies, like height or pocket footwork, be as consequential as you and others have claimed, then there would be a clear, observable impact in the data. That's not unreasonable. For example, batted passes are often used as a size-related concern (see: Baker Mayfield), yet Bryce ranked among the lowest in deflections at the line. If his stature is such a limitation, why isn't it showing up there? Or are you suggesting that's why his passing yards fall short of your expectations? If the latter, I would hope that you're not discounting yards left on the field due to drops (of which he led the league in).  Also, asking for specific, measurable benchmarks isn't aggression... it's accountability. If that feels uncomfortable, it might be worth reflecting on how much of your anti-Bryce argument is grounded in subjective perception rather than objective metrics. So, again: do you have any specific KPIs beyond total passing yardage, height, and weight that you consider relevant to evaluating whether a QB is top-10? If you want to add YPA and passing yards per game to those metrics, that's fair, just be clear about it. But let's not pretend that asking for clarity is some kind of provocation. I'm simply trying to understand the actual criteria... not just the vibes.
×
×
  • Create New...