Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Quick Breakdown On McVay's Playcall On The Double Slant For The TD


Saca312

Recommended Posts

So, after calling that this TNF was going to be good, I sat excited and amazed at the offensive geniuses in McVay and Shanahan. Both gave it their all, alongside the teams and their efforts. A very fun game overall.

Looking at that, one particular play stood out. An endzone RPO concept that was used twice in a row, each with different results. Essentially, RPO is defined as a "run, pass option" at its core. It's how the Rams used this common play that's really intriguing.

Let's take a look at the first time the Rams tried this concept.

RPO1.gif.d8a6133ffc19446d69c7faa8beef7415.gif

The Rams initially split with one receiver on the right and bunch two on the left. #17 from the right draws back in to block. The 49ers are in man coverage at the goal-line 

What's interesting is just exactly how this initial play is used as a "diagnostic." They run Gurley on the first play, a smart choice considering it was a second down. Notice how the Rams expose the 49ers are indeed in man coverage, as they send their two bunched receivers on double slants.

Gurley isn't able to punch it in, but that's okay, because there's still third down.

RPO2.gif.55ddf3baa2f08af17080813136e8d274.gif

Once again, Rams line up just how they did on the original play. The Rams initially split with one receiver on the right and bunch two on the left. #17 from the right draws back in to block. The 49ers are in man coverage again at the goal line.

The two receivers both run a slant, with the top receiver "picking" the backside DB with his route. The corner's forced to wait, as he can't just shove or try to get past the first receiver lest he wants to get a penalty. 

The underneath receiver comes in behind with plenty of space. Goff makes the easy throw for the sure touchdown.

Very creative stuff. Just wanted to highlight something I really thought was cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jase said:

The first receiver should've never gotten a free release in the first place. This game is less an offensive chess match than it is a comedy of defensive errors.

True. Inside CB tried to jam and failed pretty miserably at it. If he's successful in his jam, outside CB has a much better shot of making a play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The CBs should've recognized that it was the same play and adjusted. Thinking that the chances of them running the same play, 2x in a row, with the same focus, Gurley, seems unlikely. Therefore I'd want my CB to react differently and jump the route. You open up a problem by losing contain on that side but the betting guess is pass at that moment. Nice play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I realize it about the expectations, but on paper, we drafted players who would have a chance to compete at positions where any could realistically step in and take the job---Freeling?  Yup.  Hunter?  Yup.  Brazzell?  Yup.  It is likely that all three see the field early and often.  Day 3:  Lee?  I see him as the #3 CB and the job is his when they are ready for him--and it is his to lose.  Hecht?  I loved him in mock research and called him the best C in the draft.  He might play a year behind Fortson or he could take the job--regardless, he is the obvious front runner for the 2027 season.  Wheatley?  I see Ransom and Moehrig as basically the same "in the box" type S.  If Wheatley can learn for a season behind Scott, he has the tools to be a serviceable FS, something this team needs.  Finally, Kuwatch seemed to be a PS pick, and he could be--but to win the 4th ILB job, he needs to beat out Bam Morris-Scott and with a 46.5 vertical (I can't do that on the triple jump) and a superior RAS rating, he looks like a special teamer and depth piece.....I forgot about Morgan's comment about giving up the 5th--probably to get ahead of Detroit.  Freeling has the athleticism and the tools to be the best OT in this draft.  The others lacked arm length or something like that--Freeling simply lacks a ton of experience. 
    • excellent points and insights.  I agree on Tepper.  I guess I worry that his questions and comments might influence the thinking of his employees, that his presence in the room might add pressure to an already stressful situation, but after watching it again, it does not appear to be like that.  Morgan was in charge.  Canales mentioned needing a center, but beyond that, he was there to serve as a consultant, more or less, if asked.  I suppose my point was this--everyone knew their roles, I did not see egos--I saw empowerment.  As for Morgan--I saw a leader that listened to others, made wise decisions, and never lost control.  I was VERY IMPRESSED with Dan Morgan. 
    • Pretty good summation, although I would caution just a bit that there might be a little of over-enhanced expectations. I do agree with the assessment on BPA. It was exceedingly clear they had a specific shopping list. Early on when there was some discussion about the tackles available, Morgan was asked if he was willing to give up a 5th to get Freeling, if it came to that. I think the only way it wasn't a left tackle with that 1st pick is if none that were valued as a 1st were still available.
×
×
  • Create New...