Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Quick Breakdown On McVay's Playcall On The Double Slant For The TD


Saca312

Recommended Posts

So, after calling that this TNF was going to be good, I sat excited and amazed at the offensive geniuses in McVay and Shanahan. Both gave it their all, alongside the teams and their efforts. A very fun game overall.

Looking at that, one particular play stood out. An endzone RPO concept that was used twice in a row, each with different results. Essentially, RPO is defined as a "run, pass option" at its core. It's how the Rams used this common play that's really intriguing.

Let's take a look at the first time the Rams tried this concept.

RPO1.gif.d8a6133ffc19446d69c7faa8beef7415.gif

The Rams initially split with one receiver on the right and bunch two on the left. #17 from the right draws back in to block. The 49ers are in man coverage at the goal-line 

What's interesting is just exactly how this initial play is used as a "diagnostic." They run Gurley on the first play, a smart choice considering it was a second down. Notice how the Rams expose the 49ers are indeed in man coverage, as they send their two bunched receivers on double slants.

Gurley isn't able to punch it in, but that's okay, because there's still third down.

RPO2.gif.55ddf3baa2f08af17080813136e8d274.gif

Once again, Rams line up just how they did on the original play. The Rams initially split with one receiver on the right and bunch two on the left. #17 from the right draws back in to block. The 49ers are in man coverage again at the goal line.

The two receivers both run a slant, with the top receiver "picking" the backside DB with his route. The corner's forced to wait, as he can't just shove or try to get past the first receiver lest he wants to get a penalty. 

The underneath receiver comes in behind with plenty of space. Goff makes the easy throw for the sure touchdown.

Very creative stuff. Just wanted to highlight something I really thought was cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jase said:

The first receiver should've never gotten a free release in the first place. This game is less an offensive chess match than it is a comedy of defensive errors.

True. Inside CB tried to jam and failed pretty miserably at it. If he's successful in his jam, outside CB has a much better shot of making a play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The CBs should've recognized that it was the same play and adjusted. Thinking that the chances of them running the same play, 2x in a row, with the same focus, Gurley, seems unlikely. Therefore I'd want my CB to react differently and jump the route. You open up a problem by losing contain on that side but the betting guess is pass at that moment. Nice play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Me and you clearly have different definitions of production. If you remove the 2023 season where Thielen had just over 1k yards he is 43rd on our all time receivers list just ahead of Jonathan Mingo. And before you ask why would we remove that season? Well a couple reasons. For one thing we won a whopping 2 games. And for the biggest. Thielen was 14th in targets in 2023. We absolutely force fed him the ball all season and finished with the 32nd passing offense. For comparison sake 33 year old Jerricho Cotchery eclipsed over 1k total yards in just 2 more games and with 67 less targets than Thielen did in that 2023 season. He has above average hands. That's it. We overpaid him because we were desperate and overvalued him. That's the reality no matter how many times you or anyone else wants to quote me and get defensive about it.
    • He's played great and it was a win-win (rare free agent) for both parties.  One of the points is he hasn't made enough difference to "waste" 35 million on. Another point is by the time Panthers are hitting their prime, he would have taken snaps away from young WRs/TEs/RBs. "Thus" in the long term, hurting the teams new future "window."  But I dare think of the monkey poo of a offense the Panthers had without him the past 2 years. Lack of talent leads to many problems, including paying a 35 year old to be somewhat respectable. Hes one of few that cared enough and made a effort. Plus you know he's done great stuff in many other ways for the team, community juggernaut, leadership, etc.  Judgement is for AT and his 3 year panther career!!
    • But it has gotten a little wacky. RBs-https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/contracts/_/position/rb     A couple months ago iggles made Bark the highest guaranteed RB, jeanty was until then. That's what matters the guarantee. A rookie never played a down was the leader, until iggles howie made things right.  If a safety gets drafted in the top 8 or so, he would have the highest money too or very close to it.    Add in TEs and C too.    Even with the fixed %, the numbers are getting too much for a player that's not proven themselves.     Plus anytime a QB is drafted it screws up the contracts for players around and if next year a punter gets drafted at the same 90th spot, they want the same contract with the 5.7% increase. Teams would be laughing.    Its just reached this point. Another 10 years and I bet the vets will be crying.     
×
×
  • Create New...