Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam's QBR this week is 7. Is it time to sit him down?


raleigh-panther

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, raleigh-panther said:

Cam is a shell of what he used to be

it is clear that shoulder is not well and there has to be other things going on

should the Panthers follow Indy's lead and sit him Down?

really starting to be concerned about how he is managed

we aren't winning with him in this  condition 

We won twice with him in this condition

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, raleigh-panther said:

Cam is a shell of what he used to be

it is clear that shoulder is not well and there has to be other things going on

should the Panthers follow Indy's lead and sit him Down?

really starting to be concerned about how he is managed

we aren't winning with him in this  condition 

Cam was awful yesterday.

That doesn't make QBR any less of a poo stat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s time to face facts that Cam isn’t ready to play.  This is not the Cam Newton we have seen in the past.  He doesn’t even have is strength down overthrowing everyone and his accuracy is worse than ever.  If we are going to be successful we have to do what the bears did to the Steelers yesterday, and what we did against Buffalo and SF.  That’s run, run and run some more.  We will go as far as the defense and our two headed monster of Rbs will take us.  Welcome back to Fox ball, except it’s actually our only shot until Cam gets back to form and it’s football we can actually be successful playing with our current team construction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Snake said:

I can promise if you put Anderson in there his will be lower. Not the QB but the system. JR doesn't fire you for incompetents. 

I really don't think this is true to be honest.

 

Anderson may not be the talent Cam is but he has also proven he can come out and efficiently distribute the ball and not eat sacks.

 

When Cam plays we either win games or lose them dependent upon him. Anderson can play within a system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, UnluckyCharms said:

Still won lol. OP said we aren't winning with him in this condition but we did it twice.

My point to you. And you know it, so no need to be cute, the upcoming games against, NE, Det, Philly, Atl, are. not winnable with what we are seeing here

yes, against two earlier teams, the Panthers won but we saw the missed throws and other issues, a healthy Newton does not do those things

whyallow him to beaten up further? Give that shoulder rest may benefit the rest of the season

i truly feel the Panthers have mishandled him and he probably has two years tops left as this comtinues

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...