Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lol panthers trade rumor!!


DelhommesTheMan

Recommended Posts

So apparently this rumor was discussed on the radio. Cowboys fans actually think we would trade them Smitty! I think this rumor is so absurd, but at the same time they would actually have to BLOW us away for this trade to even be considered...

http://boards.espn.go.com/boards/mb/mb?sport=nfl&id=dal&tid=5578512&lid=14

Doing my due diligence posting this crap, im sure it could be a good discussion...

So is Smitty tradeable?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The same rumor went around last year whenever Jake had his meltdown after the Zona game. Cowboys fans were calling for them to make a trade for Smith. Its not going to happen. He is probably one of the 5 untouchable players that we have.

1. Steve

2. Beason

3. Deangelo

4. Gross

5. Otah

There is no way in hell ANY of those players get away from the Panthers unless they force their way out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest though, if Fox gets fired, it wouldn't surprise me a bit if the new coach decided to trade Smitty for draft picks. It would send the message that nobodys job is safe, and it's about the only way he could get back into the first round of the draft. I would do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The same rumor went around last year whenever Jake had his meltdown after the Zona game. Cowboys fans were calling for them to make a trade for Smith. Its not going to happen. He is probably one of the 5 untouchable players that we have.

1. Steve

2. Beason

3. Deangelo

4. Gross

5. Otah

There is no way in hell ANY of those players get away from the Panthers unless they force their way out.

DeAngelo is not untouchable. The others are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • From what I gather, sure it allows you more room in that you can manipulate the cap more due to smaller prorated amounts to fit salaries in, but for cap purposes, you're still on the hook for the money at the end of the day.    "ChatGPT You said: What are the advantages for NFL teams to sign larger signing bonuses? ChatGPT said: NFL teams often use large signing bonuses as a strategic tool in contracts. While they cost real cash up front, they offer several advantages, especially when it comes to salary cap management, player retention, and negotiation leverage. Here's a breakdown of the benefits: ✅ 1. Salary Cap Flexibility Signing bonuses are prorated over the life of the contract (up to 5 years) for salary cap purposes. This allows teams to spread out the cap hit, even if the player receives the money immediately. Example: A $20M signing bonus on a 4-year deal counts only $5M/year against the cap. ✅ 2. Attracting Top Talent Players love signing bonuses because they're guaranteed money paid up front. Offering a bigger signing bonus can sweeten the deal without inflating yearly salaries. ✅ 3. Front-Loading Real Cash, Not Cap Teams with strong cash flow can pay big bonuses now while minimizing the immediate cap hit. Useful for teams trying to build around rookie QB contracts or with flexible cash budgets. ✅ 4. Locking in Key Players Larger bonuses make it harder for a player to be released early due to dead cap consequences. This can create more job security for the player and roster continuity for the team. ✅ 5. Leverage in Restructures Big signing bonuses create future cap hits via proration. Teams can later restructure deals (e.g., convert salary to bonus) to create even more cap space. ✅ 6. Competitive Edge In free agency, a team offering more guaranteed cash up front often wins the bidding war, even if the total contract value is lower than another team's. ⚠️ Key Caveat: Large signing bonuses increase dead cap risk if the player is cut or traded early."   I think that roster bonuses can be a useful tool if you're trying to keep players in by manipulating numbers and spreading the hit over time, but I don't think that it's something that you want to use unless it's "necessary." I don't know that you want to get into signing rookies on roster bonuses, as the bust rate is relatively high.    
    • not even if that team in New Orleans disbands before the first game.  Saw one 2026 mock that had them drafting first next year.  
    • Right, so basically what I said in my first post about this last night. Tepper needs to use that big wallet of his in one of the few ways it can be used in the NFL given the cap.   Give Scourton a bigger signing bonus but not a fully guaranteed deal. Everyone wins in that scenario as if Scourton is smart and hires good money people, he'll take that bigger signing bonus and use it to make more money in the end over the next 4 years than if he just had his fully guaranteed deal and a smaller signing bonus.
×
×
  • Create New...