Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Weekly Power Rankings


Kentucky Panther

Recommended Posts

Just now, dldove77 said:

New England is 2-2 yet still top seven on espn. I don't think we're a top ten team, but... let's just call a spade a spade. New England should rightfully be somewhere in the bottom half of the league right now. 

I think the Panthers should be right around 10 right now.  I also don't mind New England being that high, either.  They're 2 -2, but both of their losses are to the 4 - 0 Chiefs and 3 - 1 Panthers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Jase said:

ESPN's rankings never make sense. Buffalo beat Atlanta and didn't move up?

Some of these are just based of if the person making them likes the team or not. Power rankings are fun to talk about but completely pointless as there is no actual statistical formula used to formulate the rankings 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Opponents are still completing 71 percent of their passes against Carolina, but Peppers is at least knocking them back a bit." LOL .

But maybe not though, I hate how our secondary still getting shredded . And with Coleman out for a month , Stafford and Wentz are going to be taking some deep shots against us. And Wentz has the oline to do it a number of times. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

"Opponents are still completing 71 percent of their passes against Carolina, but Peppers is at least knocking them back a bit." LOL .

But maybe not though, I hate how our secondary still getting shredded . And with Coleman out for a month , Stafford and Wentz are going to be taking some deep shots against us. And Wentz has the oline to do it a number of times. 

Guess we're gonna find out what our new DC is made of......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Jase said:

ESPN's rankings never make sense. Buffalo beat Atlanta and didn't move up?

they've got to hold to that narrative.

we just beat the patriots and have a better record and they are still way ahead of us?

burn it all down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kentucky Panther said:

I think the Panthers should be right around 10 right now.  I also don't mind New England being that high, either.  They're 2 -2, but both of their losses are to the 4 - 0 Chiefs and 3 - 1 Panthers. 

well.. to be fair, they also only beat the team who beat us and the Texans who were starting Watson for the first time. i think a mid-tier ranking suits the Pats right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeh, I saw other rankings where the panthers are below 2-2 teams but others are high. It's a popularity contest.

atlanta should have dropped more. I saw they dropped to 4, Patriots dropped to like 13-14.

atlanta should have dropped like that. Bills have a good defense but atlanta was the heavy favorite.

panther beat Patriots in New England, which is brutal. That was impressive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Lil Stanky 100% in the dot tonight... And our 2nd line has been our best offensive line this season. Maybe our 2C really was on the roster this whole time...?
    • That’s a grade I kind of expected tbh. I’m not a huge fan of NS, but he’s not as bad as what the huddle says he is minus the horrible game he had vs the Rams. I’ve always thought he’s often used as a scapegoat. The improved pass rush should hide his deficiencies a little bit better if he’s the game one starter. FS might have to be a position we punt on this year unless Thieneman falls to us at 19. The reality is, you're going to have a few average players in certain spots for a team with as many holes we had before free agency started. You can’t sign everyone. 
    • I am by no means trying to say he's a world beater. I'm saying it's trending in the right direction. Especially when measured against himself.i think the team feel the same way or else they wouldn't have picked up his option. Plus I think there is a new idea in the NFL about these young QBs. Teams give up to soon. Browns gave up to soon on baker same with the jets on Geno and darnold. Maybe they are who you thought they were in the draft process and they need more time to develop than you originally planned. Either way. I do think he is as capable as darnold is as far as you can win a championship with him. And something he does have that darnold doesn't is he is clutch.  If I need one more drive and 2 mins to go I'm betting on Bryce and I am far from a homer, just going off his game winning drives. He has that dog in him on the last drive.
×
×
  • Create New...