Has Worley Regressed?

[CRA]

Looks the same to me.  If I was an opposing QB I’d throw at him all game.  Bradyberry progressed.  Worley and Sanchez never did in games.  Worley remained on size and position 

[Fox007]

Imagine this defense with Bradberry and Norman.....fugin.....

[Bartin]

44 minutes ago, mrknowitall said:

I agree on that second call. That was such a nit pick of a PI. 

He had a fistful of jersey as the WR was going up for the ball. That is PI every single time. It doesn't get much easier of a call than that and it was right in the refs face.

[AppHeel]

I think Worley will be fine. He can improve in pass coverage, but he's already above average in run support from the Corner position imo. 

[bobsfoodbasics]

He has an ankle injury.

Think he has been dealing with it for a few weeks.

[bobsfoodbasics]

39 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

Imagine this defense with Bradberry and Norman.....fugin.....

Imagine keeping Norman and not having the money to sign KK 

[juliosantos]

hes bad , i like semour much better 

[juliosantos]

i like him off the bench like a rotation corner and he is pretty decent at run stopping but is a liability in coverage 

[Anybodyhome]

Regressed from where, exactly?

For some reason, Panther Nation somehow got the idea this guy was good when, in fact, he's probably a backup or nickel (at best) anywhere else in the league. 

[beastson]

1 minute ago, Anybodyhome said:

Regressed from where, exactly?

For some reason, Panther Nation somehow got the idea this guy was good when, in fact, he's probably a backup or nickel (at best) anywhere else in the league. 

Lol you got me there, but come on... dude looks worse than last year. Maybe he is injured.

[lightsout]

For anybody claiming Worley does well in coverage, watch him every snap next game. You'll always see him giving receivers space to catch because he's terrified of getting beat. Always 5-7 yards off the line, never plays the out breaking routes, seldom times the in breaking routes. He's below average, to be nice.

[Anybodyhome]

1 minute ago, beastson said:

Lol you got me there, but come on... dude looks worse than last year. Maybe he is injured.

He looked a little better last year because he had better DBs around him. 

[Khyber53]

1 hour ago, mrknowitall said:

I agree on that second call. That was such a nit pick of a PI. 

But also, we gave up the fourth most passing yards per game in 2016, and this year we’re giving up the fifth least. And we’ve faced Tom Brady and Drew Brees. Who average 260 & 283 passing yards a game for their entire careers.

If Worley can supposedly only be #2 CB backup quality, and we still hold teams under 200 net passing yards per game and less than 215 receiving yards per game, then I’m okay with his performances. 

When you subtract yards after catch, we’re allowing teams to average just 5.3 yards per completed pass. Teams are getting 41% of their receiving yards against us after the catch, and considering the average pass length, that seems to be as much of a linebacker and nickel corner problem in tackling after the catch, as it is a Daryl Worley issue. 

He’s fine. Let him be great. 

He might be a know it all, but this guy makes sense. Welcome aboard!

[ImfromClayton]

I don't think he's regressed, but if you are game planning against our D, you're gonna throw his way a heck of a lot more than 24's.  I think he's much better than some we've had in the past. If he gives us that effort week in and week out, and he's the worst thing about our defense, we are gonna be just fine.