Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

4-2


cookinbrak

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Chardee MacDennis said:

So you are saying we lose to Packers, Bucs twice, Falcons twice, and Saints again? 

That's exactly what Im saying. Maybe we beat MN and split with the Bucs but I'll be shocked if we dont implode. Our defense is terrible, and our QB has to play like a created player in Madden every week for us to have a shot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In terms of the schedule, we're not in a bad spot. 4-2 is always a good record to have at this point for any team. Plenty of season left. The way we've lost those two games, this one in particular, is the problem.

We got manhandled and out-coached by a team that was very beatable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, BIGH2001 said:

I'm sure most of us would have taken 4-2 at this point with the schedule we had. What is unacceptable is that we are 1-2 at home.

Bingo. Its hard to reconcile how a team that looks so good against NE and Detroit can be this bad at home. 

Objectively speaking, 4-2 is not bad. Just so deflating losing this way at home and with the Luke injury 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Seltzer said:

Bingo. Its hard to reconcile how a team that looks so good against NE and Detroit can be this bad at home. 

Objectively speaking, 4-2 is not bad. Just so deflating losing this way at home and with the Luke injury 

Shot week and bad coaching don't mix well. We could have easy won if our offense would have just not turned the ball over. 14 points off of ints are killer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Wanting that type of play and being okay with paying $55 million a season for it are two entirely different things. If Bryce were to become the same player Purdy has been, then he would surpass my expectations of him and I'd be okay with him as our QB of the future (and again, I've long been one of the bigger anti Bryce people here who doesn't think he is capable of being our long term solution). But in no world would I be okay with paying him THAT kind of money, paying an average starter elite money is just a terrible decision.
    • I don't think they can overcome that mistake. Hell Lance was a hiccup compared to this. He isn't going to be able to carry that price tag and now he is going to have to do just that. Lol. The NFL is so dumb sometimes.
    • So, one could say that T-Mac is quicker than someone of his size should be and while he might not be quite as fast as Evans in the 40, he's more athletic than Evans. If only someone, anyone, could have seen that in his tape and mentioned that on here, hmmmmmmm In all seriousness, hearing he tested in the 89th percentile in that drill at his size is crazy impressive.  Just tried to look up the times of the top WRs in the league right now, most don't show at time for that, but I did see Chase ran his in 7 seconds flat. I honestly don't know how true this is, but I do remember seeing one breakdown of his tape and the person said he has quiet and efficient feet.  That he's really good at using the minimal steps possible to make his cuts and because of that, it actually makes him look slower to the human eye because you don't see all the quick chop steps that the guys like Tyreek would use in their running. I'm still in a state of disbelief that he's a Panther and it might not fully hit me until week 1 and I see him out there making plays for us, still feels like Goodell is going to just be like, "YOU GOT PUNKED!!!  hahaha, he's a Cowboy now, suck it"
×
×
  • Create New...