Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The KB trade wouldn't be so terrible if...


t96

Recommended Posts

It was a first round pick, or even 2nd from at terrible team like the Browns... But a 3rd round pick from a possible playoff team? Really? We guaranteed would've got a comp pick if we let him walk. This makes no sense whatsoever. Hunrey out-Hurneyed himself somehow. Didn't even think it was possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

3 minutes ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

Cam has proven to be more successful without him, which is why i'm not too worried.

also, i think certain things happened behind closed doors that we're not aware of. 

 

Been saying this all year... He has talent no doubt, but the offense does not click when he is on the field. Its very hard for an offensive coordinator to have to develop a game plan for a supposedly talented WR that doesn't have speed and can't run crisp routes. I'm probably in the minority on this but I truly feel you will see a more crisp offense come Sunday. Everyone is wondering why the 2016 and 2017 Panthers can't find their 2015 magic, well the reason was the just traded to the Bills. I wish him great success in Buffalo but it was never going to work here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

Cam has proven to be more successful without him, which is why i'm not too worried.

also, i think certain things happened behind closed doors that we're not aware of. 

 

I'm not all that worried about our success without KB but I'm extremely worried about the nincompoops running the team right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...