Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFC South Division still up for grabs


NAS

Recommended Posts

Division is pretty straight forward right now. 

New Orleans wins its final three games, they are the champs. 

Atlanta wins its final three games, they are the champs. 

Carolina likely will need to win out and hope for one more New Orleans loss to win the division. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so if we win on sunday, we're tied, however Saints swept us so they have the tiebreaker. 

we'll have the bucs, packers and falcons

saints will have the jets, bucs, and falcons

we'll need them to lose one and we'll need to win out. 

I don't see the Saints losing at home to the Falcons

And I sure as hell don't see them losing to the jets or bucs

so ladies and gentleman, we're fuged!

our only shot is the wildcard, and our odds just got worse with the falcons win today.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CatTower said:

We win this week and we are in the exact position we were in before the Saints game.  This is great.  We can forget the Saints game ever happened, finish the season on a 4-0 run and open up the playoffs at home.  The dream is alive!

umm no. saints have the tiebreaker against us, so we'll need them to lose one more game.

They're not going to lose to the Falcons again at home, and they're not losing to the bucs or jets.

so we're fuged. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

umm no. saints have the tiebreaker against us, so we'll need them to lose one more game.

They're not going to lose to the Falcons again at home, and they're not losing to the bucs or jets.

so we're fuged. 

Saints had multiple key injuries tonight.  They'll be lucky if they aren't missing a lot of those key guys next week.  I'm not giving them any victories after tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CatTower said:

Saints had multiple key injuries tonight.  They'll be lucky if they aren't missing a lot of those key guys next week.  I'm not giving them any victories after tonight.

well then our only hope is ATL going into NO and beating them as they desperately keep their playoff hopes alive.

but if that's the case, say we take care of the vikings, bucs, and packers .... do you think we can go into ATL the final week and come out with a win? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CatTower said:

Saints had multiple key injuries tonight.  They'll be lucky if they aren't missing a lot of those key guys next week.  I'm not giving them any victories after tonight.

And we lost to the Bears and tried losing to the Jets...we aren't giving us any victories either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the book has been fairly written on Darnold, and by and large stays true. He can be rattled by pressure, and will lose his composure. If a team can get to him and have something go wrong in the plan, the mistakes and errors will pile up. Rams have a better offense, Seahawks sport a better defense. Should be a good 1.
    • Not a defense of him...an understanding of the problem. (something you seem to be lacking right now) 🙄 Bryce in a Canales offense is not an example of a stylistic mismatch, but I can give you one if that helps. When he was playing for the Panthers, Cam Newton sat under OC's running Coryell type offenses. Newton had a big arm and was a strong runner. He fit into that sort of attack very well. Then he goes to New England, where at the time they were running an Earhardt-Perkins system (similar to WCO In a lot of what they do but very different terminology). The Patriot offenses back then were heavily based on timing and rhythm style passing, not something that Newton was especially well suited for. So he washed out at New England, not because he had poor ability (his abilities had been on display here on a regular basis) but because he didn't fit what they wanted to do with their offense. I always go back to Jeff Garcia as one of the prime examples of this issue. Garcia in a WCO looked like a world beater. Put him in any other scheme though...yikes!  So again, Young's issues here have nothing to do with any failure to mesh with Canales. Hell, is say Canales has actually done pretty well at adapting his system to who he has rather than trying to jam square pegs into round holes. Again, it doesn't take an elite level of football knowledge to get this. It's pretty basic. But if you're not even capable of understanding what the real problem is, how are you going to know you to find the right solution? 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...