Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rod Chudzinski


Recommended Posts

With the firing a Pagano in Indy Chudsinski is probably going to be available.

Chudz was a Hurney hire and Shula was a Gettleman hire.  Maybe Hurney brings back his guy.

Our offense was very dynamic with Chudz and as much as many of us hated is complexity it is far better than the Shula creativity.

Would you Welcome Chudz back with the Defense we have now?.  In 2011 and 2012 we absolutely sucked defensively.   Now we have a top tier defense and Chudz would put us back on top offensively.

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

With the firing a Pagano in Indy Chudsinski is probably going to be available.

Chudz was a Hurney hire and Shula was a Gettleman hire.  Maybe Hurney brings back his guy.

Our offense was very dynamic with Chudz and as much as many of us hated is complexity it is far better than the Shula creativity.

Would you Welcome Chudz back with the Defense we have now?.  In 2011 and 2012 we absolutely sucked defensively.   Now we have a top tier defense and Chudz would put us back on top offensively.

Thoughts?

My dream of 2 TEs would finally come true lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Squirrel said:

Didn't Cam run 60% of the snaps when Chud was here?  Cam wouldn't last the season doing that. 

He also threw for 4000 yds in those first two seasson.

16 minutes ago, Jmac said:

Enough moving backward....time to move foward. We been there and done that. Hopefully Hurney is gone very soon.

While I agree moving forward is a good idea you can't forget how dynamic our offense was.  This is the type of offensive mind we need for Cam.   I would tell you this.... We would have destroyed Denver with him.

3 minutes ago, sanjay_rajput said:

My dream of 2 TEs would finally come true lol.

Greg Olsen and Jeremy Shockey were a nasty pair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think you've nailed what we need right here.  Rodriguez and Thieneman would be my choices, Thieneman in the first and Rodriguez in the second. Let everyone else eat up their picks on the crop of WRs and linemen. Then make a push in free agency for the top center.
    • Vernon Gholston vibes?  had 14 sacks at Ohio State in 2007; 45 games in the NFL:  0 sacks.  
    • I want a high impact player, but a true FS who could qb the secondary might be more effective than we realize.  I don't think Moehrig is that guy (I think he is overpaid, however).  I want a flashy, high impact player, but we could use defensive qbs at ILB  and FS.  By upgrading skill AND adding vision and leadership, could we get better than if we added an edge or OT? I am not sure that I believe this myself, but I try to look at things from all perspectives.  Here is some devil's advocacy stuff: 1. EDGE-We are freaking out about the pressure we put on the qb from the edge position.  However, Jones II and Wonnum missed a total of 22 games. Scourton was a rookie and Princely was a third rounder.  Wharton sucked (not sure if he was used properly--a hybrid who can rush from the 5 tech or 3, etc), and this put more pressure on Scourton and the other edge players.  This year, we get Jones II, Scourton should continue to evolve with Princely.  Perhaps another rookie is not what we need.  Maybe a veteran situational pass rusher.  2. OFFENSIVE TACKLE:  Of course, we need an OT, but the draft is loaded with OTs that can pass block but struggle in run blocking--so a rookie at LT might not be the answer for a team that wants to run first.  What to do?  I am not sure.  I see Nijman returning after testing the market, but who knows? 3.  INSIDE LB:  A huge need, regardless of how you spin it.  However, I see a few free agents who would be solid here, and I see the second round having a few ILBs with starting potential.  I do not see an ILB worth the first round pick unless a freak falls to us. 4.  With veteran defensive backs, a young, intelligent FS could fit in nicely. Intelligence is key--like the way Luke made the front 7 better. "A good, intelligent free safety (FS) acts as the "quarterback of the defense" transforming a unit from good to great by acting as the last line of defense, communicating pre-snap adjustments, and anticipating plays before they happen. By reading the quarterback's eyes and diagnosing offensive schemes, an intelligent FS acts as a "centerfielder" who can neutralize deep threats and mitigate errors made by cornerbacks or linebackers."  
×
×
  • Create New...