Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Evolution


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

 

Quote

Jacob Manly @JAKE_OB 3h3 hours ago

Replying to @PanthersBill

Rivera: "Offense must evolve" 2016 Off YPG: 19th 2017 Off YPG: 19th Cam Newton 2017: 80.7 psr rate - 2nd worst of career (75.8 - 2016) 16 INTs - 2nd worst of career (17 - 2011) 3,302 yds - 2nd worst of career (3,127 - 2014) 6.7 yd/avg - Career worst 206.4 yds/G - Career worst

1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
 

 Bill Voth @PanthersBill 3h3 hours ago

not good

 

Ouch.

Looking back, I can't help feeling like we stopped "evolving" after the first few games and just went back to the same old things we'd been doing, which led to the same result (i.e. needing Newton to bail us out at the end of games in order to win).

How much "evolution" did you see?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

So in about a million years or so we'll have a competent offense?

I don't think Shula can change for the better, and he showed no evidence of it this year. But as far as criticizing him for not having an offensive evolution in one year, while the QB missed a ton of camp and relying on a rookie as a key piece, is fairly ridiculous. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, thomas96 said:

I don't think Shula can change for the better, and he showed no evidence of it this year. But as far as criticizing him for not having an offensive evolution in one year, while the QB missed a ton of camp and relying on a rookie as a key piece, is fairly ridiculous. 

Still had three months of a healthy Newton to work with.

And even that doesn't explain why we're running what Riddick called "training camp day one" pass routes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

And even that doesn't explain why we're running what Riddick called "training camp day one" pass routes.

But this has nothing to do with "evolution." This is play design. You're arguing micro while evolution is macro. I've never once tried to praise Shula for anything on the micro level. Because it's flat out horsesh*t. And I don't think his strategy on the macro level is anything amazing, earth-shattering, or to write home about. Simply average probably. And when you're a play caller being terrible on the micro level, no matter how great the overall strategy, doesn't cut it. I'm 100% for getting rid of Shula. But to try to criticize him for lack of "evolution" within 1 season is unfair.

 

And as far as the routes against the Falcons go... I'm not so sure that wasn't intentional in order to not show our hand before the playoffs... I really hope that it wasn't, because it's dumber to not gameplan for a huge game for that could be (and wound up being) for the division or even the 2 seed. But I don't put it past Ron to go into week 17 trying to not put what they're doing on film. Stupid, but Ron does a lot of stupid things like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, thomas96 said:

But this has nothing to do with "evolution." This is play design. You're arguing micro while evolution is macro. I've never once tried to praise Shula for anything on the micro level. Because it's flat out horsesh*t. And I don't think his strategy on the macro level is anything amazing, earth-shattering, or to write home about. Simply average probably. And when you're a play caller being terrible on the micro level, no matter how great the overall strategy, doesn't cut it. I'm 100% for getting rid of Shula. But to try to criticize him for lack of "evolution" within 1 season is unfair.

And as far as the routes against the Falcons go... I'm not so sure that wasn't intentional in order to not show our hand before the playoffs... I really hope that it wasn't, because it's dumber to not gameplan for a huge game for that could be (and wound up being) for the division or even the 2 seed. But I don't put it past Ron to go into week 17 trying to not put what they're doing on film. Stupid, but Ron does a lot of stupid things like that.

I don't put the lack of evolution on Shula.  I put it on Rivera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, if evolution were but a simple, straight and unbothered line --- amoebae to homo extremis in 30 generations and lasers by day 5.

Evolution has never been about the leaps and bounds but by the dogged trial and error mixed with an unwillingness to give up on tomorrow.

We've had a lot of growing pains (and a lot of serious injuries to boot) but somehow the team put together 11 winning performances, some against some very strong play-off teams. We may fall flat at the start of the post season, we may stall out somewhere along the way, or we might just hoist a trophy in our battered, weary hands at the end of all this.

I've got faith in them, I still believe, how about you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shula is incapable of evolving. He might change a little, but it will be lateral movement at best. He’s awful. He’s been awful at every point of his career. He’s too old of a dog to be learning new tricks. And Rivera doesn’t want to evolve. He’ll pay lip service, but he’s too gd stubborn in his ways. Probably the military upbringing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In all honesty, he should probably get that checked out. It might be (Arnold Schwarzenegger voice) "a tuuumaaa" 
    • Ah yes, my bad. It's easy to forget those handful of games Frank coached. LOL 
    • I've seen the comp a few times, and I feel there is a lot to it. Our situation is a lot like Kansas City was pre-Mahomes (without the HOF HC) Whether you like them or not, D&D are building something here.  They had a strong draft.  The team is slowly coming together, developing some identity, and has some decent blue chip parts.  Brown, Horn, McMillan, and a good OL situation that we should keep fortifying every year.  It's not much yet, but growing.    Bryce is in that Alex Smith spot.  A top draft pick, has never been overly impressive, but you can win games when he's safe with the ball.  You're not winning because of him - maybe once in a blue moon.  From time to time he's shown the ability to orchestrate some plays and lead drives.  I just don't see anything that is like - "oh snap, yeah don't let him go, he's ours".  He'll make a solid/good throw every now and again, but man, it is a struggle a lot of the time to watch.  Some terrible performances to speak of, heck he's already been benched once during year 2.      He should in no way preclude you from flirting with what else is out there.  This is not a marriage.  If you're in position (or trade range) for a guy you REALLY like come draft day, you shoot your shot. If we are in the draft process, and suddenly realize QB3-4 is a guy we really like, that's when you make a modest jump from like 16 to 11 or something like that.  Just like the Bills did for Allen, like the Chiefs did for Mahomes.  This is nothing magical that plants this franchise savior title on them, this is not some stupid trade-- it's an easy trade up to get a guy you like w/a big ceiling.  It's all player dependent and coaching/development driven.  If we don't like a QB, by all means fortify the front-7, get an awesome OLB or ILB prospect.   But we're on year 3, you kind of know what you're getting at this point.  Mostly sub-200 yard performances, low YPA, bad technique, poor mechanics, some decent stuff sprinkled in, but some bad turnover heavy ones that kill the team's momentum.  Again, run with him if there's no complete disaster that happens the remainder of the season, but don't close the door on something better just because of the investment or debatable performances.     
×
×
  • Create New...