Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I'm telling you guys..


Cam's New Arm

Recommended Posts

It would piss me off beyond measure to know that this coaching staff treated this game as a preseason game, putting our QB and other players in harm's way against a team who was fighting for their postseason lives.  

If you want to lay an egg, fine.  Just don't do it with the starters in there knowing we have a playoff run to make.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Smithers said:

It would piss me off beyond measure to know that this coaching staff treated this game as a preseason game, putting our QB and other players in harm's way against a team who was fighting for their postseason lives.  

If you want to lay an egg, fine.  Just don't do it with the starters in there knowing we have a playoff run to make.  

Not having a game plan is different than not trying as a team. They most likely had a gameplan, but it was an extreme conservative approach as opposed to an aggressive approach in the past. 

 

Billy B. does this constantly in the late weeks for the Pats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

Not having a game plan is different than not trying as a team. They most likely had a gameplan, but it was an extreme conservative approach as opposed to an aggressive approach in the past. 

 

Billy B. does this constantly in the late weeks for the Pats.

But if you do not gameplan around another teams weaknesses, you are exposing your QB to unnecessary hits.  I understand playing it conservative...but to not account for the strengths of another team while your WR's run basic routes that result in them not getting open (which means the QB holds the ball longer or has to scramble, exposing him to more hits) is stupid.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

Not having a game plan is different than not trying as a team. They most likely had a gameplan, but it was an extreme conservative approach as opposed to an aggressive approach in the past. 

 

Billy B. does this constantly in the late weeks for the Pats.

The Pats have enjoyed the leisure of playing in a terrible division for years. When you have the division locked up you can afford such luxuries. When you're potentially playing to host a playoff game and avoid facing a division rival who has had your number this year in their stadium no less, you can't afford to do it.

As maddening as it would be, I truly hope that's what we did Sunday because if not then we just plain suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

4 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Not having a game plan is different than not trying as a team. They most likely had a gameplan, but it was an extreme conservative approach as opposed to an aggressive approach in the past. 

 

Billy B. does this constantly in the late weeks for the Pats.

I can see this theory somewhat. There were a lot of plays and personnel groupings that weren't used/not called that we had used most of the season with some vanilla stuff thrown in. Especially the protections but that may have been because Turner was out. The miscues between Greg and Cam could point this way though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That is just Panthers history pain speaking.
    • From what I gather, sure it allows you more room in that you can manipulate the cap more due to smaller prorated amounts to fit salaries in, but for cap purposes, you're still on the hook for the money at the end of the day.    "ChatGPT You said: What are the advantages for NFL teams to sign larger signing bonuses? ChatGPT said: NFL teams often use large signing bonuses as a strategic tool in contracts. While they cost real cash up front, they offer several advantages, especially when it comes to salary cap management, player retention, and negotiation leverage. Here's a breakdown of the benefits: ✅ 1. Salary Cap Flexibility Signing bonuses are prorated over the life of the contract (up to 5 years) for salary cap purposes. This allows teams to spread out the cap hit, even if the player receives the money immediately. Example: A $20M signing bonus on a 4-year deal counts only $5M/year against the cap. ✅ 2. Attracting Top Talent Players love signing bonuses because they're guaranteed money paid up front. Offering a bigger signing bonus can sweeten the deal without inflating yearly salaries. ✅ 3. Front-Loading Real Cash, Not Cap Teams with strong cash flow can pay big bonuses now while minimizing the immediate cap hit. Useful for teams trying to build around rookie QB contracts or with flexible cash budgets. ✅ 4. Locking in Key Players Larger bonuses make it harder for a player to be released early due to dead cap consequences. This can create more job security for the player and roster continuity for the team. ✅ 5. Leverage in Restructures Big signing bonuses create future cap hits via proration. Teams can later restructure deals (e.g., convert salary to bonus) to create even more cap space. ✅ 6. Competitive Edge In free agency, a team offering more guaranteed cash up front often wins the bidding war, even if the total contract value is lower than another team's. ⚠️ Key Caveat: Large signing bonuses increase dead cap risk if the player is cut or traded early."   I think that roster bonuses can be a useful tool if you're trying to keep players in by manipulating numbers and spreading the hit over time, but I don't think that it's something that you want to use unless it's "necessary." I don't know that you want to get into signing rookies on roster bonuses, as the bust rate is relatively high.    
    • not even if that team in New Orleans disbands before the first game.  Saw one 2026 mock that had them drafting first next year.  
×
×
  • Create New...