Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Norwell restricted FA ....ready for big money


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Regardless of the post season results. It's 2018 and he will be looking to get paid. Hired D.Rosenhaus as his agent and it wont be easy to negotiate a team  friendly contract. He is the real deal and we really can't afford to lose him. What are the options with him bring a restricted FA. How do we get this done without killing the cap.....opinions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He was a RFA last year. He'll be unrestricted this year. He can go to the highest bidder and the Panthers will receive nothing unless we get a comp pick next year.

  I would have to imagine that we would get 3rd for him, given the salary he will command and level of play(barring injury). But I don’t have a clue what the actual criteria of formula is. Just a guess based on the past.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Toomers said:

  I would have to imagine that we would get 3rd for him, given the salary he will command and level of play(barring injury). But I don’t have a clue what the actual criteria of formula is. Just a guess based on the past.

 

It also depends on who we sign in free agency. You basically have to get fleeced to get a 3rd round comp pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

It also depends on who we sign in free agency. You basically have to get fleeced to get a 3rd round comp pick.

  See. That’s what I mean...lol. I knew that part and just forgot about it. Thanks for the heads up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
    • This is the right move even if you think Bryce isn't the future. Everything except signing him to a long term deal until proven otherwise. There's a decent chance we have a shot to draft a QB next year that we like. 
    • If we're still bad enough that Canales gets fired, especially if it's during the season, there is no way we could ever attract any HC worthy of the job if we told them they had to keep Bryce their first year. That would be 2 coaches he's gotten fired and 4 years of not performing up to par. I still say replace both of them next offseason.  I like Canales the man and I think he's done an absolutely outstanding job at fixing our locker room issues, as it was really bad before he showed up.  But I just don't see it from him with his in game decision making, I think he's held us back just as much as Bryce has, just in different ways. Canales was our Dan Campbell, the coach you hire to turn the franchises culture around for the HC after them to inherit and take to the next level.   The difference was he had some elite coordinators early on and really let him focus on his "leader of men" role as opposed to the X's and O's that Canales does himself and it's turned out well for him.
×
×
  • Create New...