Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For those pleading for speed at the WR position


Adb6368

Recommended Posts

I really do hate this saying and I may get crushed for this but... the answer actually is on our roster currently.

Curtis Samuel - 4.31 40-yd dash at NFL combine. 20th best of ALL TIME

Damiere Byrd - 4.28 40-yd dash at his pro day. Obviously not comparable as he was not invited to the NFL combine.

Both of these players were not available for the most important game of our year. And yes, I know Samuel wasn't a world-beater prior to injury but he was hurt all offseason. I have a feeling if he is healthy for TC he will have an impact next year similar to what CMC had for us this year. We do have speed, it just was not present when we needed it. 

The point of this is - we have much bigger holes elsewhere. Namely DE, CB, S, T, TE and potentially guard if Norwell leaves. We should not be wasting valuable cap space on WR or drafting one high when we saw flashes of what speed looked like throughout the year. Cam made Kaelin Clay look serviceable! Imagine what he will do with his full arsenal of weapons heading into next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Samuel was literally hurt off and on since he showed up for OTAs. I have no faith in him at this point.

Byrd pretty much the same durability issue question mark surrounding him.

Both these guys need to be on our roster, but we cannot put any stock into them being the answer at WR.

We have to improve our talent level there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Adb6368 said:

I really do hate this saying and I may get crushed for this but... the answer actually is on our roster currently.

Curtis Samuel - 4.31 40-yd dash at NFL combine. 20th best of ALL TIME

Damiere Byrd - 4.28 40-yd dash at his pro day. Obviously not comparable as he was not invited to the NFL combine.

Both of these players were not available for the most important game of our year. And yes, I know Samuel wasn't a world-beater prior to injury but he was hurt all offseason. I have a feeling if he is healthy for TC he will have an impact next year similar to what CMC had for us this year. We do have speed, it just was not present when we needed it. 

The point of this is - we have much bigger holes elsewhere. Namely DE, CB, S, T, TE and potentially guard if Norwell leaves. We should not be wasting valuable cap space on WR or drafting one high when we saw flashes of what speed looked like throughout the year. Cam made Kaelin Clay look serviceable! Imagine what he will do with his full arsenal of weapons heading into next season.

Don't listen to the fools that are giving you crap over this.  It's quit apparent that a large majority of the board knows nothing about football. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do agree with the OP that situation somewhat fixes itself when Samuel and Byrd return. However we need to sign a FA WR so this kind of sht doesn’t happen again.

Those two going down and not having anyone behind them are the reason we are out of the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man these guys all want Cam killed by 30. 

With our first 4 picks of course we should draft safety, corner, defensive end and offensive tackle ,.. no particular order, BPA.

im not crazy on Hurney drafting a wide receiver in any round— we will get Dwayne Jarrett or Ryne Robinson or some other shite.

free agents we bring in another safety, 2 wide receivers and I’m about a free agent running back like Blount or even Jeremy Hill if Cinci doesn’t keep him.

if we can bring back peppers and then defense, skip star to sign Norwell. 

We do those things I think we are ok. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

Don't listen to the fools that are giving you crap over this.  It's quit apparent that a large majority of the board knows nothing about football. 

How so?

Just because we have other needs doesn’t mean WR is any less of an issue. It just means we have a lot of holes to fill, which isn’t a good thing.

If we go into the season banking on Samuel or Byrd we are in some serious trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Samuel will be a virtual rookie next year. Plus,  he was drafted to play in the slot (not saying that speed isn't desired there).  He is still raw.  

Byrd had one notable game. 

Both have an injury history now,  especially Byrd who is naturally a smaller guy.   Someone suggested in another thread that all he needs to do is put on some muscle,  but I don't think that they know that he already has put on muscle.  He is probably about as big as he is going to get and keep his edge. 

Even Funchess looked a little gimpy at different points during the season. 

I wouldn't say that either Byrd or Samuel (of course)  have proved they are elite route runners and are ready for the rigors of the pro game at this point.  As such, we really need to shore up the position and provide insurance and security.  An influx of talent is always welcome, and it breeds competition and brings out the best in the whole corps. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...