Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Giants Have The Pieces In Place To Name Steve Wilks Their Head Coach Today


bobsfoodbasics

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

It's a smart but risky move if they sign him as a coach.  Dave has inside knowledge of Wilkes which gives Wilkes an edge to some extent.  If Dave does sign him it will be interesting to see how it turns out over the next couple of seasons.

But weren't we told by many right here in this forum that nobody on the team liked Gettleman?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

But weren't we told by many right here in this forum that nobody on the team liked Gettleman?

Actually someone specifically said Wilks didn't like Gettleman because of the whole Norman thing.

3 minutes ago, Cracka McNasty said:

Everyone talking about Del Rio, does he have any experience with a 4-3? All his defenses I remember him utilizing a 3-4.

Yes, when he was our DC under John Fox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cracka McNasty said:

Completely forgot he was under Fox. For some reason I thought it was Seifert. 

Seifert ran a 4-3 too. It was a variant of some sort which used a designated pass-rusher referred to as an "elephant" (I don't remember all the specifics).

The only time we ran a 3-4 was under Capers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, theballboy said:

I cant too but I’ll give him another season to prove himself after last Sunday. Cam threw for 300 plus yards with HS recievers. 

Lol...thats Cam not Shula...it's kinda like the old saying that Dean smith was only person to hold Jordan under 20 pts a game...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tiger7_88 said:

But weren't we told by many right here in this forum that nobody on the team liked Gettleman?

You can hear all kinds of ridiculous bs on the huddle.  Common sense can filter out most bullshit but common sense ain't too common.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's been discussed. Generally assumed to be Eric Washington but Washington could follow Wilks wherever he goes. 

Voth seemed to indicate yesterday that if Wilks wants Washington the team might not block him.

If Wilks leaves, Washington follows and loosing Washington hurts more then Wilks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...