Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

When you wish upon a Star...


MHS831

Recommended Posts

·         “I don't know what's going to happen,” the pending free agent  (Star) said, “so I'm going to take all of this (The Panther wear in his locker) and give it away to my family.”

·         “I'm not worried about it. I know I'll find a job, if it's here or somewhere else.”

     

“I "I probably will (test the waters),” Lotulelei said. “I'd like to see what my offers are out there.”

“Like I said, I'd love to stay here. I love the guys around here. I love this locker room, coaches have been great. But I'm going to do what's best for myself and my family.”

MHS Analysis (pure gold around here): This is a man who is going to test the market, giving the Panthers a slightly better than 1/32 chance of signing him. Many on here are suggesting that we are going to re-sign Star, but I do not see the signs that suggest that.    Star would be foolish not to find a 3-4 team looking for a stud NT. I think 3-4 teams may pay more for his skill set than we should.  I think we are looking for more pass rush from the DT position and maybe more versatility.   

First, what is the statistical difference between the very inexpensive Kyle Love and Star.  Over the last three seasons, Star averaged 24 tackles and 2 sacks (I realize that most of his work is to take on double teams, but I have to use the stats I have available—this is not necessarily indicative of his overall value).  During the same time, Love, playing fewer reps, mostly in running situations, averaged about 17 tackles and just over 2.5 sacks per season.  No real difference, considering playing time. 

Butler is 330 put plays closer to KK than Star, but if we are looking for more pass rush and maybe more versatility, is it possible that we could use Butler at both NT and 3 technique,  depending on situation?  Even without an additional DT, Imagine Butler and Love in short yardage, KK and Butler on 3rd and long, for example. Butler can also play 3 tech, so you have some versatility, depending on situation.   Instead of putting Butler in the KK rotation, there are situations where both can play on the same line. For example, on passing downs, KK and Butler is a formidable front, with Butler having enough size to anchor. 

I just do not see the point of wishing upon a Star this off season.  Instead, look for a mid to late-round DT to join the rotation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t see Star staying. He’s looking to cash out and we have too many other needs. I would like to see Vernon be given a shot. I don’t think he would give up much in the run game while adding to our pass rush. He’s a big dude.

If we insist on keeping Butler at 3 tech then I would keep my eye closely on the Broncos. They may release Domata Peko. I think he’s a solid option that would not be expensive. Nice stop gap until we find our next NT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, carpanfan96 said:

We have no one on the roster that can do what Star does, his double teams open it up for KK, Addison and peppers on the dline and for Luke and TD at LB. Butler can't do that effectively like Star. He's easily the second most important defensive player on the team.  

I like Star and I'd love to keep him, but I honestly don't think there's a massive drop off from him to Kyle Love and I'm personally tired of seeing us waste 1st round picks in backup roles during the cheap years of their contracts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it's just the fan in me, but he really has rubbed me the wrong way since the end of the season. Being rational and realistic about contract prospects is one thing, but he's literally talking about how he's ready to throw away all his Panthers stuff and get out is pretty harsh/shitty to hear as a fan. Guys can say we'll see how it goes and it's a business, but he's been relatively outspoken about his desire to leave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:

I felt he was gone before the season.

I also think we can replace him fairly easily in the draft, which is weird to say about replacing a first round pick.

We might even replace him with his brother.

I feel the same. A first rounder with no pro bowls or all-pro selections who is only a space eater. His stats also aren't even better than Brentson Buckner's time with us in the same number of years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ericr0319 said:

i agree Star is great, but how does he open it up more for KK? Or is KK that good? Because if anyone should be double teamed it would be KK, opening the way for Star to get after it more, but it is the other way around. 

The double team talk is primarily focused on running plays, specifically running plays between the tackles. The NT almost always takes on a double team on those plays. On offense, if you can't control the NT on those between the tackle plays, it's over before it ever got started. On defense, that NT has to be able to hold his ground against those double teams. If he gets bulldozed out of the way you're gonna get gashed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ericr0319 said:

i agree Star is great, but how does he open it up more for KK? Or is KK that good? Because if anyone should be double teamed it would be KK, opening the way for Star to get after it more, but it is the other way around. 

Because that’s his technique. He’s basically a nose tackle in opposite scheme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...