Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rae Carruth Letter - breaking the silence


Paa Langfart

Recommended Posts

I believe is second chances for convicts that do their time.

 

The man has ( or will have shortly) paid his debt to society. I say let him attempt to pay the debt he owes to the boy.  Slowly,  cautiously, and for the love of all that's Holy in a supervised way but there is no justice in continuing to make Caruth suffer if he is a reformed and repentant man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Inimicus said:

I believe is second chances for convicts that do their time.

 

The man has ( or will have shortly) paid his debt to society. I say let him attempt to pay the debt he owes to the boy.  Slowly,  cautiously, and for the love of all that's Holy in a supervised way but there is no justice in continuing to make Caruth suffer if he is a reformed and repentant man.

Justice....??

Rae Curuth should have been dead long ago if there was justice

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a messed up situation, so messed up.    The only thing he should have put in the letter is the public apology and his plea to have a part in his son's life.     I don't know what the rest really accomplished.     I don't blame the grandmother for doing what she has to do to take care of the child, even IF there was some lies or whatever.      But if we don't believe, after serving his time, that he should have a chance to be part of society and all that, then why even have jail?    He IS right that the grandmother won't live forever, and if he's truly prepared to dedicate his life to taking care of the child, he should have the chance, obviously under watchful eye at first.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce Young has recorded 4 game-winning drives through nine weeks, leading the Carolina Panthers to crucial victories in tight contests. The 12-play, 58-yard clock-killer versus the Packers in Week 9 (16-13 upset). This pace positions him as the team's most clutch performer in years, with a 68.4% success rate on go-ahead drivesalready surpassing many franchise benchmarks early in his career.   Young's early 2025 surge (top-5 league-wide in clutch EPA at 0.28 per dropback) not only outstrips the debuts of Newton (2 in 2011) and Delhomme (1 in 2003) but hints at him climbing this list quickly if the Panthers sustain their wildcard hunt. Data underscores his growth: no other Panther QB hit 4 GWDs before Week 10 in a season.   The energy fans pour into the stadium directly shapes Bryce Young’s performance positive support has been shown to elevate his fourth-quarter efficiency by 12%, strengthening team cohesion and execution under pressure. Criticizing or booing the starting quarterback fractures morale, disrupts focus, and undermines the very resilience needed in clutch moments. When fans stand firmly behind their QB and team, they become a true home-field advantage, amplifying performance and accelerating the path to sustained success. Now are you a Carolina Panther fan or a Panther hater? 
    • Bryce would have extended some plays scrambling with his legs but then again he also has a high number of fumbles so you never know what you're going to get and the way the Bills were getting after Andy (sacked 7 times) it stands to reason Bryce would have been under duress often. What exactly do you want here? I mean I'm going to go by the gameplan I saw after Bryce turned the ball over against GB. Clearly Dave Canales was deliberately trying to limit the opportunities for him to make a catastrophic mistake. And didn't Micah Parsons log zero QB pressures? So with that in mind if you are asking for anyone to argue our offense with Bryce would have had much if any success against that opportunistic motivated Bills defense while we were also splitting carries between Rico and Chuba who had the majority of them which ended up being a situation resulting in a weeks worth of scathing criticism and deservedly so then I'm going to just have to say we can agree to disagree.
×
×
  • Create New...