Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ranking the transition of Positions from college to Pros..


WOW!!

Recommended Posts

The LB transition is much harder than the RB or DE.  By LB I mean the off the ball LB not the 3/4 edge rushing guys.  I would also say C have it much harder than OT just because of the line calls they have to make.  In college, it depends on the school, some of those are made from the sidelines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, bababoey said:

The LB transition is much harder than the RB or DE.  By LB I mean the off the ball LB not the 3/4 edge rushing guys.  I would also say C have it much harder than OT just because of the line calls they have to make.  In college, it depends on the school, some of those are made from the sidelines.

Yeah that's a good point.. I would switch LB with RB..

The thing about OT and C is.. I get C make all the line calls so they have a mental transition.. But they have help on each side of them.. OT are often left on a island having to deal with all types of pass rusher and outside blitzer... And OT usually come in having to bulk up.. So not only do they have a mental transition but a physical one .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WOW!! said:

Ranking from easiest to hardest the transition of each position in football excluding Kickers and Punters..

1. Guards

2. DT

3. LB

4. RB/FB

5. DE

6. C

7.OT

8. TE

 

9.WR

10. DB

11. QB

 

How do Virginia Tech players translate to NFL?

what about Lehigh or Mercer players? The gamecocks put out some good NFL players too. 

Does St Johns have a football team?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 4Corners said:

How do Virginia Tech players translate to NFL?

what about Lehigh or Mercer players? The gamecocks put out some good NFL players too. 

Didn't know this was the college basketball forum.. See you Sat. Sweetheart...

Now back to football

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought the transition for DTs was more difficult than that.

Then again, it could be our experience of drafting DTs before Star and Short made it seem way more difficult. But I would put DE/DT around the same area just before TE. Every once in a while you'll find a stud, but the majority take a couple years to start showing why you drafted them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Cracka McNasty said:

I thought the transition for DTs was more difficult than that.

Then again, it could be our experience of drafting DTs before Star and Short made it seem way more difficult. But I would put DE/DT around the same area just before TE. Every once in a while you'll find a stud, but the majority take a couple years to start showing why you drafted them. 

I pretty much agree.. But I do feel DE more than DT are asked to do more and the physical transition for most of them take a year.. While DT come in pretty big and physical already.. DE have to work more on Tech, pass rush moves and dropping back in passing zones more than DT ..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All these rankings have more to do with the writers love or hate for a team.  Morgan, IMO, has done a really good job at building this team.  Yeah, there are a couple of whiffs but for the most part he has done quite well drafting and signing free agents.  22 is a bit low but it's a stupid opinion based on how little a writer knows about the Panthers. 
    • When I saw that I was thinking the same thing.  If Evero does have a great season and gets hired as a head coach I wouldn't mind see McD as our DC.  If we do poorly as a team, I definitely would want him to be the front runner for HC.
    • But it's not about not upsetting a player under contract, it's about not causing a rift in the locker room. The players love Bryce, whether as a person or a player doesn't matter.  You can't spend a Top 10 pick on a QB and then still start your #1 overall pick in the last year of their contract. That act alone will cause a massive locker room rift/distraction that would be unavoidable.  Some players will question why you "wasted" a Top 10 pick on a QB you're not going to start instead of someone who can help right away.  While others will question why we are keeping Bryce around for the season when it's clear he's not the future guy at that point. It would just make for a bad start to the rookie's career while causing locker room distractions.  Again, I'd bet this has never happened in this league before with any 1st round QB, let alone the #1 overall pick, and there is a reason for it, which is that it would be epically stupid to do. And I used the Vikings as the example as they're the closest I can think of, because again, there isn't a direct comparison as nobody has ever done it because it's that dumb of an idea (no offense lol).
×
×
  • Create New...