Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL.com Prospect Grades?


section543

Recommended Posts

So how much stock do you put into these ratings?

Barkley, Nelson, Edmunds, Chubb and Darnold are the only ones rated between 7-7.5

Ridley, Roquan Smith, Vea, Fitzpatrick, and Payne are the next at 6.5-6.9

21 players from 6-6.4

9.00-10 Once-in-lifetime player
8.00-9.00 Perennial All-Pro
7.50-7.99 Future All-Pro
7.00-7.49 Pro Bowl to All-Pro Ability
6.50-6.99 Good NFL Starter with Pro Bowl Potential
6.00-6.49

Chance to become good NFL starter

   
   
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on how you look at it.

I'm sure they know that more then 10 players will end up making the pro bowl but that isn't the point of the grades for the entire class, its the chance for each player to achieve a certain level..  Use Sutton for example, what is more likely to happen?  He becomes a quality starter or a quality starter that makes a pro bowl?  If you had to bet your paycheck on it you would probably say quality starter, but if you have 10 players like that you know some will overachieve the grades.  I would also think that once you get past 30 players or so the odds go below 50% of the player becoming a quality starter.

Here again you aren't trying to predict the number of all pros or quality starters in a draft.  You are predicting what is most likely going to happen to each player on their own. 

Some players will beat the odds so the overall numbers will be higher then the original projection but when you view each player on their own, before the fact, I can see the point of the rankings.

Either way I tend to  look at the grades, just as not projections of what they can become, but also a way to organize the players into tiers.  I think understating the tiers in a draft helps you navigate it more efficiently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, section543 said:

So how much stock do you put into these ratings?

Barkley, Nelson, Edmunds, Chubb and Darnold are the only ones rated between 7-7.5

Ridley, Roquan Smith, Vea, Fitzpatrick, and Payne are the next at 6.5-6.9

21 players from 6-6.4

9.00-10 Once-in-lifetime player
8.00-9.00 Perennial All-Pro
7.50-7.99 Future All-Pro
7.00-7.49 Pro Bowl to All-Pro Ability
6.50-6.99 Good NFL Starter with Pro Bowl Potential
6.00-6.49

Chance to become good NFL starter

   
   

They had Kamera at 5.9 last year.  Ross 6.1.  OJ Howard 6.5.  Anyway, its just a rating by them.  Doesn't mean a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Seriously?

 

there are several posters here who think Nick Chubb is a first rounder.  They've been posting for months, despite not one single mock draft or player ranking having him not even close to 1st round material.

 

I don't get it, but huddle is gonna huddle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:

 

there are several posters here who think Nick Chubb is a first rounder.  They've been posting for months, despite not one single mock draft or player ranking having him not even close to 1st round material.

 

I don't get it, but huddle is gonna huddle.

Who knows, there might be only one RB and on WR taken in the first this year.  Will be quite unusual

I think we could get Chubb in the 3rd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you are an athlete or former athlete (myself?  Cornhole 2021-present; Disc Golf 2013-got a mega blister and had to retire; speed walking--every black Friday at Walmart 2003-2009) you know what it is to lose confidence.  Self-inflicted or not (in my view, a lot of 2023 was coaching and a lot of 2024 was confidence), he has confidence now. How fragile is it?  I think the light is on, the game slowed down, and he is ready to do his thing.  He seems to be "mobile in the pocket" instead of "running scared."   Last year, there were times when AT was out, Johnson gone, and all he really had was XL and Coker--a raw rookie with upside and an UDFA rookie.  TE was rarely a viable option. It reminded me of Benjamin and Funchess.   Moore had to step up.  This season, Bryce has weapons.  I expect XL to improve.  I expect TMac to help tremendously, and I think Coker will be solid.  Renfrow?  Horn?  bonuses.    
    • His points are valid.  However, it seems a bit based on past performance and fails to take into consideration trends and conditions that might suggest growth in 2025.   For one, he breaks the team down by position and ranks them separately.  I guess that is a fair way to do it, but they are dependent upon each other. Last year, our DL sucked.  That impacts the rest of the defense.  With no internal pressure, the QBs simply step up to avoid the Edge rush.  I would have suggested that the internal DL is now featuring pass rushers and large people who can collapse the pocket.  Secondly, the LBs were not protected very well in 2024.  It is hard to see the holes and step up when a guard is in your earhole a second after the snap.  Finally, the defensive backs will be forced to make fewer tackles and they will be better in pass protection with a new and improved DL.    Canales made an interesting comment the other day, and I (from the outside looking in) feel the same way:  (paraphrasing) "I have never seen a better group of rookies."   I think the biggest concern is the learning curve.  How long before these rookies are ready?   I am bullish on this team.  I think they win 3 of their first 4 and get confident.  The get the fans behind them.  From there, they win 6 of the remaining 13.  If they stay injury free, they have an outside shot at the NFC south.     
    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
×
×
  • Create New...